Inseego Corp (INSG) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Inseego Corp (INSG) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -54.8% as of March 2020. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($43.05 Million) from net assets ($27.80 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See INSG current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Inseego Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2015)
This chart shows how Inseego Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 1999 to 2015. As of March 2020, the ratio stands at -54.8%, reflecting net assets of $27.80 Million with intangible assets of $43.05 Million USD. See Inseego Corp liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Inseego Corp (1999–2015)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Inseego Corp from 1999 to 2015, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see INSG market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | -45.3% | $30.46 Million | $44.27 Million | $195.28 Million | ▼ -140.4 pp |
| 2014 | 95.1% | $30.55 Million | $1.49 Million | $95.02 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 95.3% | $44.92 Million | $2.13 Million | $111.47 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 96.3% | $85.45 Million | $3.16 Million | $161.53 Million | ▲ +17.8 pp |
| 2011 | 78.5% | $166.03 Million | $35.70 Million | $247.27 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2010 | 76.1% | $185.40 Million | $44.27 Million | $302.11 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2009 | 99.3% | $211.16 Million | $1.51 Million | $282.51 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 99.1% | $197.96 Million | $1.86 Million | $260.73 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 99.3% | $217.75 Million | $1.53 Million | $296.63 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2006 | 98.2% | $134.24 Million | $2.41 Million | $191.65 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2005 | 97.1% | $121.06 Million | $3.46 Million | $176.06 Million | ▲ +29.8 pp |
| 2004 | 67.3% | $100.18 Million | $32.76 Million | $116.32 Million | ▲ +20.9 pp |
| 2003 | 46.4% | $8.64 Million | $4.63 Million | $24.42 Million | ▲ +24.1 pp |
| 2002 | 22.3% | $6.50 Million | $5.05 Million | $24.05 Million | ▼ -51.8 pp |
| 2001 | 74.1% | $25.43 Million | $6.60 Million | $59.91 Million | ▼ -23.1 pp |
| 2000 | 97.1% | $79.22 Million | $2.26 Million | $110.82 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $17.06 Million | $0.00 | $38.12 Million | — |