Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock tangible net worth ratio. Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock (NUTR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.8% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($19.67K) from net assets ($10.63 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See debt-free asset ratio of Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock (2002–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock from 2002 to 2025. This chart shows how Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 99.8%, reflecting net assets of $10.63 Million with intangible assets of $19.67K USD. See Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock tangible net worth ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock from 2002 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.8% | $10.63 Million | $19.67K | $27.01 Million | ▲ +12.8 pp |
| 2016 | 87.0% | $171.99 Million | $22.28 Million | $235.85 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2015 | 89.0% | $160.25 Million | $17.61 Million | $212.45 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2014 | 85.3% | $149.61 Million | $21.96 Million | $214.78 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2013 | 86.2% | $137.88 Million | $19.08 Million | $192.31 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2012 | 84.8% | $131.06 Million | $19.87 Million | $185.92 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2011 | 83.5% | $119.67 Million | $19.69 Million | $171.66 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2010 | 79.9% | $97.62 Million | $19.67 Million | $145.04 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2009 | 82.7% | $83.47 Million | $14.45 Million | $121.80 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2008 | 88.1% | $110.51 Million | $13.15 Million | $158.72 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2007 | 92.1% | $85.05 Million | $6.75 Million | $102.23 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 92.1% | $85.05 Million | $6.75 Million | $102.23 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2005 | 90.7% | $75.64 Million | $7.02 Million | $94.08 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2004 | 90.2% | $44.93 Million | $4.39 Million | $71.61 Million | ▼ -9.2 pp |
| 2003 | 99.5% | $29.69 Million | $156.00K | $54.43 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $64.50 Million | $0.00 | $103.41 Million | — |