Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock (NUTR) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock (NUTR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.8% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($19.67K) from net assets ($10.63 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 99.8%, reflecting net assets of $10.63 Million with intangible assets of $19.67K USD. See Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock from 2002 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Nusatrip Incorporated Common Stock.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.8% | $10.63 Million | $19.67K | $27.01 Million | ▲ +12.8 pp |
| 2016 | 87.0% | $171.99 Million | $22.28 Million | $235.85 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2015 | 89.0% | $160.25 Million | $17.61 Million | $212.45 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2014 | 85.3% | $149.61 Million | $21.96 Million | $214.78 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2013 | 86.2% | $137.88 Million | $19.08 Million | $192.31 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2012 | 84.8% | $131.06 Million | $19.87 Million | $185.92 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2011 | 83.5% | $119.67 Million | $19.69 Million | $171.66 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2010 | 79.9% | $97.62 Million | $19.67 Million | $145.04 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2009 | 82.7% | $83.47 Million | $14.45 Million | $121.80 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2008 | 88.1% | $110.51 Million | $13.15 Million | $158.72 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2007 | 92.1% | $85.05 Million | $6.75 Million | $102.23 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 92.1% | $85.05 Million | $6.75 Million | $102.23 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2005 | 90.7% | $75.64 Million | $7.02 Million | $94.08 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2004 | 90.2% | $44.93 Million | $4.39 Million | $71.61 Million | ▼ -9.2 pp |
| 2003 | 99.5% | $29.69 Million | $156.00K | $54.43 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $64.50 Million | $0.00 | $103.41 Million | — |