Office Properties Income Trust Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Office Properties Income Trust tangible net worth ratio. Office Properties Income Trust (OPINL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 84.7% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($163.38 Million) from net assets ($1.07 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Office Properties Income Trust PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Office Properties Income Trust (2007–2024)
Tangible net worth ratio of Office Properties Income Trust from 2007 to 2024. This chart shows how Office Properties Income Trust's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 84.7%, reflecting net assets of $1.07 Billion with intangible assets of $163.38 Million USD. See working capital position of Office Properties Income Trust to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Office Properties Income Trust Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2007–2024)
Office Properties Income Trust tangible net worth ratio by year from 2007 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Office Properties Income Trust from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Office Properties Income Trust (OPINL) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | $1.15 Billion | $0.00 | $3.82 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $1.26 Billion | $0.00 | $3.99 Billion | ▲ +26.6 pp |
| 2022 | 73.4% | $1.39 Billion | $369.33 Million | $3.98 Billion | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2021 | 66.2% | $1.50 Billion | $505.63 Million | $4.24 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 65.9% | $1.61 Billion | $548.94 Million | $3.95 Billion | ▲ +8.8 pp |
| 2019 | 57.1% | $1.71 Billion | $732.38 Million | $4.19 Billion | ▲ +16.5 pp |
| 2018 | 40.6% | $1.78 Billion | $1.06 Billion | $5.24 Billion | ▼ -33.3 pp |
| 2017 | 73.9% | $1.35 Billion | $351.87 Million | $3.70 Billion | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2016 | 86.6% | $935.00 Million | $124.85 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2015 | 87.6% | $956.65 Million | $118.27 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2014 | 88.4% | $1.30 Billion | $150.08 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2013 | 85.6% | $989.67 Million | $142.27 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 85.9% | $1.03 Billion | $144.48 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2011 | 86.8% | $891.67 Million | $117.60 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2010 | 92.1% | $757.40 Million | $60.10 Million | $951.29 Million | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2009 | 95.7% | $352.05 Million | $15.31 Million | $514.81 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2008 | 97.6% | $413.45 Million | $10.07 Million | $419.77 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2007 | 97.2% | $420.55 Million | $11.69 Million | $431.01 Million | — |