Office Properties Income Trust (OPINL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Office Properties Income Trust (OPINL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 84.7% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($163.38 Million) from net assets ($1.07 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See working capital position of Office Properties Income Trust to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Office Properties Income Trust Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Office Properties Income Trust's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 84.7%, reflecting net assets of $1.07 Billion with intangible assets of $163.38 Million USD. See Office Properties Income Trust (OPINL) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Office Properties Income Trust (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Office Properties Income Trust from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see OPINL market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | $1.15 Billion | $0.00 | $3.82 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $1.26 Billion | $0.00 | $3.99 Billion | ▲ +26.6 pp |
| 2022 | 73.4% | $1.39 Billion | $369.33 Million | $3.98 Billion | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2021 | 66.2% | $1.50 Billion | $505.63 Million | $4.24 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 65.9% | $1.61 Billion | $548.94 Million | $3.95 Billion | ▲ +8.8 pp |
| 2019 | 57.1% | $1.71 Billion | $732.38 Million | $4.19 Billion | ▲ +16.5 pp |
| 2018 | 40.6% | $1.78 Billion | $1.06 Billion | $5.24 Billion | ▼ -33.3 pp |
| 2017 | 73.9% | $1.35 Billion | $351.87 Million | $3.70 Billion | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2016 | 86.6% | $935.00 Million | $124.85 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2015 | 87.6% | $956.65 Million | $118.27 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2014 | 88.4% | $1.30 Billion | $150.08 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2013 | 85.6% | $989.67 Million | $142.27 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 85.9% | $1.03 Billion | $144.48 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2011 | 86.8% | $891.67 Million | $117.60 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2010 | 92.1% | $757.40 Million | $60.10 Million | $951.29 Million | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2009 | 95.7% | $352.05 Million | $15.31 Million | $514.81 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2008 | 97.6% | $413.45 Million | $10.07 Million | $419.77 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2007 | 97.2% | $420.55 Million | $11.69 Million | $431.01 Million | — |