Office Properties Income Trust (OPINL) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Office Properties Income Trust (OPINL) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 84.7% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($163.38 Million) from net assets ($1.07 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Office Properties Income Trust net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Office Properties Income Trust Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Office Properties Income Trust's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 84.7%, reflecting net assets of $1.07 Billion with intangible assets of $163.38 Million USD. Also explore Office Properties Income Trust (OPINL) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Office Properties Income Trust (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Office Properties Income Trust from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Office Properties Income Trust worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | $1.15 Billion | $0.00 | $3.82 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $1.26 Billion | $0.00 | $3.99 Billion | ▲ +26.6 pp |
| 2022 | 73.4% | $1.39 Billion | $369.33 Million | $3.98 Billion | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2021 | 66.2% | $1.50 Billion | $505.63 Million | $4.24 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 65.9% | $1.61 Billion | $548.94 Million | $3.95 Billion | ▲ +8.8 pp |
| 2019 | 57.1% | $1.71 Billion | $732.38 Million | $4.19 Billion | ▲ +16.5 pp |
| 2018 | 40.6% | $1.78 Billion | $1.06 Billion | $5.24 Billion | ▼ -33.3 pp |
| 2017 | 73.9% | $1.35 Billion | $351.87 Million | $3.70 Billion | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2016 | 86.6% | $935.00 Million | $124.85 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2015 | 87.6% | $956.65 Million | $118.27 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2014 | 88.4% | $1.30 Billion | $150.08 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2013 | 85.6% | $989.67 Million | $142.27 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 85.9% | $1.03 Billion | $144.48 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2011 | 86.8% | $891.67 Million | $117.60 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2010 | 92.1% | $757.40 Million | $60.10 Million | $951.29 Million | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2009 | 95.7% | $352.05 Million | $15.31 Million | $514.81 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2008 | 97.6% | $413.45 Million | $10.07 Million | $419.77 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2007 | 97.2% | $420.55 Million | $11.69 Million | $431.01 Million | — |