Prenetics Global Ltd (PRE) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Prenetics Global Ltd (PRE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.9% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($170.00K) from net assets ($161.20 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See PRE current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Prenetics Global Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2024)
This chart shows how Prenetics Global Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 99.9%, reflecting net assets of $161.20 Million with intangible assets of $170.00K USD. See Prenetics Global Ltd (PRE) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Prenetics Global Ltd (2000–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Prenetics Global Ltd from 2000 to 2024, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see PRE company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 93.2% | $171.35 Million | $11.57 Million | $213.57 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2023 | 93.6% | $210.16 Million | $13.43 Million | $254.17 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2022 | 93.9% | $243.46 Million | $14.79 Million | $312.13 Million | ▲ +71.2 pp |
| 2020 | 22.7% | $31.01 Million | $23.96 Million | $78.88 Million | ▼ -40.1 pp |
| 2019 | 62.8% | $16.85 Million | $6.27 Million | $29.69 Million | ▼ -28.7 pp |
| 2015 | 91.5% | $6.90 Billion | $589.39 Million | $21.41 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 91.3% | $7.10 Billion | $615.98 Million | $22.27 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2013 | 90.5% | $6.77 Billion | $643.47 Million | $23.04 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 90.3% | $6.93 Billion | $670.65 Million | $22.98 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2011 | 90.9% | $6.47 Billion | $589.40 Million | $22.86 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2010 | 91.2% | $7.21 Billion | $634.25 Million | $23.36 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 90.8% | $7.65 Billion | $702.80 Million | $23.73 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2008 | 89.8% | $4.20 Billion | $429.52 Million | $16.28 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2007 | 90.1% | $4.32 Billion | $429.52 Million | $16.04 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2006 | 88.7% | $3.79 Billion | $429.52 Million | $14.95 Billion | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2005 | 86.1% | $3.09 Billion | $429.52 Million | $13.74 Billion | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2004 | 87.2% | $3.35 Billion | $429.52 Million | $12.51 Billion | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2003 | 83.4% | $2.59 Billion | $429.52 Million | $10.90 Billion | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2002 | 79.3% | $2.08 Billion | $429.52 Million | $8.74 Billion | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2001 | 75.4% | $1.75 Billion | $429.52 Million | $7.17 Billion | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2000 | 78.2% | $2.09 Billion | $455.55 Million | $6.09 Billion | — |