Sharplink Gaming Ltd (SBET) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Sharplink Gaming Ltd (SBET) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($1.74 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Sharplink Gaming Ltd short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Sharplink Gaming Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Sharplink Gaming Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 23 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $1.74 Billion with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. See Sharplink Gaming Ltd (SBET) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sharplink Gaming Ltd (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Sharplink Gaming Ltd from 2002 to 2025, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market value of Sharplink Gaming Ltd.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $2.42 Billion | $8.00K | $2.43 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2024 | 99.4% | $2.08 Million | $13.16K | $2.57 Million | ▲ +27.4 pp |
| 2022 | 71.9% | $2.99 Million | $838.46K | $65.05 Million | ▲ +11.0 pp |
| 2021 | 60.9% | $14.19 Million | $5.55 Million | $20.56 Million | ▼ -16.7 pp |
| 2020 | 77.6% | $2.71 Million | $608.60K | $4.42 Million | ▼ -8.6 pp |
| 2019 | 86.2% | $3.10 Million | $429.07K | $8.04 Million | ▼ -12.9 pp |
| 2018 | 99.1% | $2.40 Million | $21.00K | $7.52 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2017 | 97.5% | $1.71 Million | $42.00K | $8.65 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2016 | 96.6% | $1.86 Million | $63.00K | $12.29 Million | ▲ +69.2 pp |
| 2015 | 27.5% | $6.15 Million | $4.46 Million | $22.02 Million | ▼ -65.6 pp |
| 2014 | 93.1% | $5.63 Million | $389.00K | $10.89 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 92.1% | $7.16 Million | $567.00K | $12.63 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2012 | 86.4% | $5.57 Million | $759.00K | $11.12 Million | ▲ +13.8 pp |
| 2011 | 72.6% | $3.83 Million | $1.05 Million | $9.73 Million | ▲ +14.7 pp |
| 2010 | 57.9% | $3.36 Million | $1.42 Million | $9.61 Million | ▲ +15.9 pp |
| 2009 | 42.0% | $3.12 Million | $1.81 Million | $9.89 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 42.1% | $3.80 Million | $2.20 Million | $10.62 Million | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2007 | 48.7% | $1.57 Million | $805.00K | $8.48 Million | ▼ -29.6 pp |
| 2006 | 78.3% | $7.54 Million | $1.64 Million | $14.05 Million | ▲ +29.4 pp |
| 2005 | 48.8% | $9.17 Million | $4.69 Million | $13.82 Million | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2004 | 54.9% | $10.66 Million | $4.81 Million | $15.32 Million | ▼ -29.7 pp |
| 2003 | 84.6% | $14.46 Million | $2.23 Million | $18.18 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2002 | 83.0% | $14.01 Million | $2.38 Million | $17.71 Million | — |