Enersys (ENS) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Enersys (ENS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 81.4% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($352.10 Million) from net assets ($1.90 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Enersys (ENS) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Enersys Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Enersys's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 81.4%, reflecting net assets of $1.90 Billion with intangible assets of $352.10 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see ENS company net worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Enersys (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Enersys from 2002 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore how much does Enersys reinvest in capital to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 80.4% | $1.92 Billion | $375.43 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2024 | 81.8% | $1.76 Billion | $319.41 Million | $3.47 Billion | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2023 | 77.5% | $1.60 Billion | $360.41 Million | $3.62 Billion | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2022 | 73.5% | $1.49 Billion | $396.20 Million | $3.74 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2021 | 72.1% | $1.54 Billion | $430.90 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2020 | 65.1% | $1.30 Billion | $455.69 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2019 | 64.1% | $1.29 Billion | $462.32 Million | $3.12 Billion | ▼ -23.7 pp |
| 2018 | 87.7% | $1.20 Billion | $147.14 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2017 | 86.1% | $1.11 Billion | $153.96 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2016 | 84.4% | $1.02 Billion | $159.66 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2015 | 85.0% | $1.05 Billion | $158.16 Million | $2.16 Billion | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2014 | 86.4% | $1.27 Billion | $172.47 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2013 | 91.3% | $1.19 Billion | $103.70 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2012 | 89.8% | $1.04 Billion | $107.08 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 89.9% | $978.99 Million | $98.82 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2010 | 88.5% | $784.22 Million | $90.14 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2009 | 87.7% | $644.39 Million | $79.54 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2008 | 88.4% | $691.54 Million | $80.14 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2007 | 85.2% | $544.90 Million | $80.54 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2006 | 81.8% | $445.19 Million | $80.83 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2005 | 82.8% | $437.65 Million | $75.46 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +142.5 pp |
| 2004 | -59.8% | $239.30 Million | $382.32 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -80.1 pp |
| 2003 | 20.3% | $465.75 Million | $371.25 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -79.7 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $414.85 Million | $0.00 | $978.89 Million | — |