McDonald’s Corporation (MCD) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
McDonald’s Corporation (MCD) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -290.4% as of June 2016. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($2.50 Billion) from net assets ($640.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See net assets of McDonald’s Corporation for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
McDonald’s Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1985–2015)
This chart shows how McDonald’s Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 31 annual periods from 1985 to 2015. As of June 2016, the ratio stands at -290.4%, reflecting net assets of $640.00 Million with intangible assets of $2.50 Billion USD. Also explore MCD year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for McDonald’s Corporation (1985–2015)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for McDonald’s Corporation from 1985 to 2015, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of McDonald’s Corporation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 64.5% | $7.09 Billion | $2.52 Billion | $37.94 Billion | ▼ -14.2 pp |
| 2014 | 78.7% | $12.85 Billion | $2.74 Billion | $34.28 Billion | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2013 | 82.1% | $16.01 Billion | $2.87 Billion | $36.63 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 81.7% | $15.29 Billion | $2.80 Billion | $35.39 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 81.6% | $14.39 Billion | $2.65 Billion | $32.99 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2010 | 82.3% | $14.63 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $31.98 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 82.7% | $14.03 Billion | $2.43 Billion | $30.22 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2008 | 83.3% | $13.38 Billion | $2.24 Billion | $28.46 Billion | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2007 | 84.9% | $15.28 Billion | $2.30 Billion | $29.39 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2006 | 85.7% | $15.46 Billion | $2.21 Billion | $28.97 Billion | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2005 | 87.1% | $15.15 Billion | $1.95 Billion | $29.99 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 87.1% | $14.20 Billion | $1.83 Billion | $27.84 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2003 | 86.1% | $11.98 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $25.84 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2002 | 84.8% | $10.28 Billion | $1.56 Billion | $23.97 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2001 | 85.0% | $9.49 Billion | $1.42 Billion | $22.53 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2000 | 84.3% | $9.20 Billion | $1.44 Billion | $21.68 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 1999 | 86.9% | $9.64 Billion | $1.26 Billion | $20.98 Billion | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $9.46 Billion | $0.00 | $19.78 Billion | ▲ +9.3 pp |
| 1997 | 90.7% | $8.85 Billion | $827.50 Million | $18.24 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 1996 | 91.4% | $8.72 Billion | $747.00 Million | $17.39 Billion | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 1995 | 93.7% | $8.53 Billion | $534.80 Million | $15.41 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 1994 | 93.4% | $7.31 Billion | $483.10 Million | $13.59 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1993 | 93.7% | $6.61 Billion | $415.70 Million | $12.04 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 1992 | 93.4% | $5.89 Billion | $389.70 Million | $11.68 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 1991 | 92.4% | $4.84 Billion | $369.10 Million | $11.35 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 1990 | 90.8% | $4.18 Billion | $384.00 Million | $10.67 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1989 | 90.8% | $3.55 Billion | $326.00 Million | $9.18 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1988 | 90.8% | $3.41 Billion | $314.80 Million | $8.16 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1987 | 91.0% | $2.92 Billion | $261.70 Million | $6.98 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 1986 | 90.5% | $2.45 Billion | $232.00 Million | $5.97 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 1985 | 92.4% | $2.19 Billion | $166.40 Million | $5.04 Billion | — |