Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 97.2% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($21.20 Million) from net assets ($765.10 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See shareholders equity of Centrus Energy Corp. for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Centrus Energy Corp. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2025)
This chart shows how Centrus Energy Corp.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 97.2%, reflecting net assets of $765.10 Million with intangible assets of $21.20 Million USD. Also explore LEU net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Centrus Energy Corp. (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Centrus Energy Corp. from 1998 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Centrus Energy Corp..
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 97.2% | $765.10 Million | $21.20 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +15.6 pp |
| 2024 | 81.7% | $161.40 Million | $29.60 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +103.6 pp |
| 2023 | -22.0% | $32.30 Million | $39.40 Million | $796.20 Million | ▲ +429.9 pp |
| 2014 | -451.9% | $21.60 Million | $119.20 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -550.9 pp |
| 2011 | 99.1% | $752.40 Million | $6.80 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 99.5% | $1.31 Billion | $6.80 Million | $3.85 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 99.5% | $1.28 Billion | $6.80 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 99.4% | $1.16 Billion | $6.80 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $1.31 Billion | $200.00K | $3.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 99.9% | $986.00 Million | $600.00K | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2005 | 98.8% | $907.60 Million | $11.10 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2004 | 99.5% | $914.70 Million | $4.30 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $886.20 Million | $0.00 | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $914.40 Million | $0.00 | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $988.80 Million | $0.00 | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $849.70 Million | $0.00 | $2.08 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $1.11 Billion | $0.00 | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $1.04 Billion | $0.00 | $2.26 Billion | — |