Mettler-Toledo International Inc (MTD) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Mettler-Toledo International Inc (MTD) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -1134.4% as of December 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($306.05 Million) from net assets ($24.79 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See MTD book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Mettler-Toledo International Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1997–2022)
This chart shows how Mettler-Toledo International Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 1997 to 2022. As of December 2022, the ratio stands at -1134.4%, reflecting net assets of $24.79 Million with intangible assets of $306.05 Million USD. Also explore Mettler-Toledo International Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mettler-Toledo International Inc (1997–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mettler-Toledo International Inc from 1997 to 2022, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see MTD company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -1134.4% | $24.79 Million | $306.05 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -1055.1 pp |
| 2021 | -79.4% | $171.42 Million | $307.45 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -109.7 pp |
| 2020 | 30.4% | $282.68 Million | $196.78 Million | $2.81 Billion | ▼ -20.6 pp |
| 2019 | 51.0% | $420.78 Million | $206.24 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2018 | 63.2% | $590.06 Million | $217.31 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2017 | 58.6% | $547.28 Million | $226.72 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2016 | 61.6% | $434.94 Million | $167.06 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -18.6 pp |
| 2015 | 80.1% | $580.46 Million | $115.25 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2014 | 84.3% | $719.60 Million | $112.78 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2013 | 87.8% | $935.05 Million | $114.42 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2012 | 85.8% | $827.22 Million | $117.56 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2011 | 84.5% | $781.14 Million | $121.41 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2010 | 86.5% | $771.58 Million | $104.37 Million | $2.28 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2009 | 85.2% | $711.14 Million | $105.28 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2008 | 80.9% | $503.25 Million | $96.30 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 82.8% | $581.29 Million | $100.02 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2006 | 83.7% | $630.86 Million | $102.75 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +63.9 pp |
| 2005 | 19.8% | $659.00 Million | $528.21 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2004 | 22.3% | $720.89 Million | $560.18 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2003 | 16.1% | $654.00 Million | $548.81 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +23.1 pp |
| 2002 | -7.0% | $502.39 Million | $537.79 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -74.5 pp |
| 2001 | 67.4% | $388.18 Million | $126.52 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +94.9 pp |
| 2000 | -27.5% | $178.84 Million | $228.03 Million | $887.58 Million | ▲ +54.9 pp |
| 1999 | -82.4% | $112.00 Million | $204.30 Million | $820.97 Million | ▲ +186.2 pp |
| 1998 | -268.6% | $58.00 Million | $213.80 Million | $820.40 Million | ▲ +265.6 pp |
| 1997 | -534.3% | $28.90 Million | $183.30 Million | $749.30 Million | — |