Mettler-Toledo International Inc (MTD) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Mettler-Toledo International Inc (MTD) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -1134.4% as of December 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($306.05 Million) from net assets ($24.79 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Mettler-Toledo International Inc (MTD) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Mettler-Toledo International Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1997–2022)
This chart shows how Mettler-Toledo International Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 1997 to 2022. As of December 2022, the ratio stands at -1134.4%, reflecting net assets of $24.79 Million with intangible assets of $306.05 Million USD. See Mettler-Toledo International Inc liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mettler-Toledo International Inc (1997–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mettler-Toledo International Inc from 1997 to 2022, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Mettler-Toledo International Inc stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -1134.4% | $24.79 Million | $306.05 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -1055.1 pp |
| 2021 | -79.4% | $171.42 Million | $307.45 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -109.7 pp |
| 2020 | 30.4% | $282.68 Million | $196.78 Million | $2.81 Billion | ▼ -20.6 pp |
| 2019 | 51.0% | $420.78 Million | $206.24 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2018 | 63.2% | $590.06 Million | $217.31 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2017 | 58.6% | $547.28 Million | $226.72 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2016 | 61.6% | $434.94 Million | $167.06 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -18.6 pp |
| 2015 | 80.1% | $580.46 Million | $115.25 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2014 | 84.3% | $719.60 Million | $112.78 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2013 | 87.8% | $935.05 Million | $114.42 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2012 | 85.8% | $827.22 Million | $117.56 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2011 | 84.5% | $781.14 Million | $121.41 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2010 | 86.5% | $771.58 Million | $104.37 Million | $2.28 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2009 | 85.2% | $711.14 Million | $105.28 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2008 | 80.9% | $503.25 Million | $96.30 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 82.8% | $581.29 Million | $100.02 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2006 | 83.7% | $630.86 Million | $102.75 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +63.9 pp |
| 2005 | 19.8% | $659.00 Million | $528.21 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2004 | 22.3% | $720.89 Million | $560.18 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2003 | 16.1% | $654.00 Million | $548.81 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +23.1 pp |
| 2002 | -7.0% | $502.39 Million | $537.79 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -74.5 pp |
| 2001 | 67.4% | $388.18 Million | $126.52 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +94.9 pp |
| 2000 | -27.5% | $178.84 Million | $228.03 Million | $887.58 Million | ▲ +54.9 pp |
| 1999 | -82.4% | $112.00 Million | $204.30 Million | $820.97 Million | ▲ +186.2 pp |
| 1998 | -268.6% | $58.00 Million | $213.80 Million | $820.40 Million | ▲ +265.6 pp |
| 1997 | -534.3% | $28.90 Million | $183.30 Million | $749.30 Million | — |