Mettler-Toledo International Inc (MTD) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Mettler-Toledo International Inc (MTD) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -1976.4% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($266.26 Million) from net assets ($12.82 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore MTD net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Mettler-Toledo International Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1997–2022)
This chart shows how Mettler-Toledo International Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 1997 to 2022. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at -1976.4%, reflecting net assets of $12.82 Million with intangible assets of $266.26 Million USD. Check Mettler-Toledo International Inc PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mettler-Toledo International Inc (1997–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mettler-Toledo International Inc from 1997 to 2022, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market cap of Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -1134.4% | $24.79 Million | $306.05 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▼ -1055.1 pp |
| 2021 | -79.4% | $171.42 Million | $307.45 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -109.7 pp |
| 2020 | 30.4% | $282.68 Million | $196.78 Million | $2.81 Billion | ▼ -20.6 pp |
| 2019 | 51.0% | $420.78 Million | $206.24 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2018 | 63.2% | $590.06 Million | $217.31 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2017 | 58.6% | $547.28 Million | $226.72 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2016 | 61.6% | $434.94 Million | $167.06 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -18.6 pp |
| 2015 | 80.1% | $580.46 Million | $115.25 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2014 | 84.3% | $719.60 Million | $112.78 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2013 | 87.8% | $935.05 Million | $114.42 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2012 | 85.8% | $827.22 Million | $117.56 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2011 | 84.5% | $781.14 Million | $121.41 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2010 | 86.5% | $771.58 Million | $104.37 Million | $2.28 Billion | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2009 | 85.2% | $711.14 Million | $105.28 Million | $1.72 Billion | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2008 | 80.9% | $503.25 Million | $96.30 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 82.8% | $581.29 Million | $100.02 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2006 | 83.7% | $630.86 Million | $102.75 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +63.9 pp |
| 2005 | 19.8% | $659.00 Million | $528.21 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2004 | 22.3% | $720.89 Million | $560.18 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2003 | 16.1% | $654.00 Million | $548.81 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +23.1 pp |
| 2002 | -7.0% | $502.39 Million | $537.79 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -74.5 pp |
| 2001 | 67.4% | $388.18 Million | $126.52 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +94.9 pp |
| 2000 | -27.5% | $178.84 Million | $228.03 Million | $887.58 Million | ▲ +54.9 pp |
| 1999 | -82.4% | $112.00 Million | $204.30 Million | $820.97 Million | ▲ +186.2 pp |
| 1998 | -268.6% | $58.00 Million | $213.80 Million | $820.40 Million | ▲ +265.6 pp |
| 1997 | -534.3% | $28.90 Million | $183.30 Million | $749.30 Million | — |