Transdigm Group Incorporated Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Transdigm Group Incorporated tangible net worth ratio. Transdigm Group Incorporated (TDG) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -47.5% as of June 2013. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.18 Billion) from net assets ($801.73 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore net asset growth rate of Transdigm Group Incorporated to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Transdigm Group Incorporated (2003–2012)
Tangible net worth ratio of Transdigm Group Incorporated from 2003 to 2012. This chart shows how Transdigm Group Incorporated's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 10 annual periods from 2003 to 2012. As of June 2013, the ratio stands at -47.5%, reflecting net assets of $801.73 Million with intangible assets of $1.18 Billion USD. Check TDG strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Transdigm Group Incorporated Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2003–2012)
Transdigm Group Incorporated tangible net worth ratio by year from 2003 to 2012. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Transdigm Group Incorporated from 2003 to 2012, covering 10 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Transdigm Group Incorporated market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 7.8% | $1.22 Billion | $1.12 Billion | $5.05 Billion | ▲ +10.0 pp |
| 2011 | -2.1% | $810.95 Million | $828.37 Million | $4.51 Billion | ▼ -34.6 pp |
| 2010 | 32.5% | $592.98 Million | $400.39 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -22.0 pp |
| 2009 | 54.5% | $819.16 Million | $372.92 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2008 | 45.5% | $653.90 Million | $356.19 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +14.2 pp |
| 2007 | 31.3% | $487.55 Million | $334.90 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -6.4 pp |
| 2006 | 37.8% | $363.04 Million | $225.96 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +263.7 pp |
| 2005 | -225.9% | $333.11 Million | $1.09 Billion | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +24.1 pp |
| 2004 | -250.0% | $297.41 Million | $1.04 Billion | $1.35 Billion | ▲ +18.0 pp |
| 2003 | -268.0% | $283.55 Million | $1.04 Billion | $1.32 Billion | — |