Imalliance SA (MLIML) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Imalliance SA (MLIML) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -142.9% as of December 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (€594.33K) from net assets (€244.72K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Imalliance SA shareholders equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Imalliance SA Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2022)
This chart shows how Imalliance SA's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 1999 to 2022. As of December 2022, the ratio stands at -142.9%, reflecting net assets of €244.72K with intangible assets of €594.33K EUR. Also explore how fast is Imalliance SA growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Imalliance SA (1999–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Imalliance SA from 1999 to 2022, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see MLIML market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (EUR) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -142.9% | €244.72K | €594.33K | €2.37 Million | ▲ +18.7 pp |
| 2021 | -161.5% | €229.43K | €600.03K | €3.04 Million | ▲ +20200.8 pp |
| 2020 | -20362.4% | €3.04K | €622.88K | €2.95 Million | ▼ -19976.7 pp |
| 2019 | -385.7% | €134.16K | €651.67K | €1.78 Million | ▼ -230.0 pp |
| 2017 | -155.8% | €55.56K | €142.10K | €2.11 Million | ▼ -173.6 pp |
| 2015 | 17.8% | €267.19K | €219.65K | €2.83 Million | ▲ +29.8 pp |
| 2014 | -12.0% | €193.10K | €216.27K | €2.53 Million | ▼ -66.8 pp |
| 2013 | 54.8% | €549.86K | €248.57K | €2.61 Million | ▼ -24.2 pp |
| 2012 | 79.0% | €758.76K | €159.34K | €2.42 Million | ▼ -17.3 pp |
| 2011 | 96.3% | €4.62 Million | €168.68K | €5.93 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2010 | 97.4% | €1.43 Million | €37.69K | €2.74 Million | ▲ +26.8 pp |
| 2009 | 70.5% | €1.00 Million | €295.86K | €1.99 Million | ▼ -28.1 pp |
| 2008 | 98.6% | €511.86K | €6.92K | €1.42 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2007 | 99.7% | €404.13K | €1.32K | €1.36 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2006 | 97.8% | €355.11K | €7.72K | €1.01 Million | ▲ +97.8 pp |
| 2005 | 0.0% | €16.89K | €16.89K | €1.43 Million | ▼ -90.7 pp |
| 2000 | 90.7% | €1.47 Million | €136.80K | €5.90 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 1999 | 93.6% | €1.70 Million | €109.25K | €4.70 Million | — |