Imalliance SA Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Imalliance SA tangible net worth ratio. Imalliance SA (MLIML) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -142.9% as of December 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (€594.33K) from net assets (€244.72K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check strategic asset allocation of Imalliance SA to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Imalliance SA (1999–2022)
Tangible net worth ratio of Imalliance SA from 1999 to 2022. This chart shows how Imalliance SA's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 1999 to 2022. As of December 2022, the ratio stands at -142.9%, reflecting net assets of €244.72K with intangible assets of €594.33K EUR. See MLIML net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Imalliance SA Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1999–2022)
Imalliance SA tangible net worth ratio by year from 1999 to 2022. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Imalliance SA from 1999 to 2022, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Imalliance SA market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (EUR) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -142.9% | €244.72K | €594.33K | €2.37 Million | ▲ +18.7 pp |
| 2021 | -161.5% | €229.43K | €600.03K | €3.04 Million | ▲ +20200.8 pp |
| 2020 | -20362.4% | €3.04K | €622.88K | €2.95 Million | ▼ -19976.7 pp |
| 2019 | -385.7% | €134.16K | €651.67K | €1.78 Million | ▼ -230.0 pp |
| 2017 | -155.8% | €55.56K | €142.10K | €2.11 Million | ▼ -173.6 pp |
| 2015 | 17.8% | €267.19K | €219.65K | €2.83 Million | ▲ +29.8 pp |
| 2014 | -12.0% | €193.10K | €216.27K | €2.53 Million | ▼ -66.8 pp |
| 2013 | 54.8% | €549.86K | €248.57K | €2.61 Million | ▼ -24.2 pp |
| 2012 | 79.0% | €758.76K | €159.34K | €2.42 Million | ▼ -17.3 pp |
| 2011 | 96.3% | €4.62 Million | €168.68K | €5.93 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2010 | 97.4% | €1.43 Million | €37.69K | €2.74 Million | ▲ +26.8 pp |
| 2009 | 70.5% | €1.00 Million | €295.86K | €1.99 Million | ▼ -28.1 pp |
| 2008 | 98.6% | €511.86K | €6.92K | €1.42 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2007 | 99.7% | €404.13K | €1.32K | €1.36 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2006 | 97.8% | €355.11K | €7.72K | €1.01 Million | ▲ +97.8 pp |
| 2005 | 0.0% | €16.89K | €16.89K | €1.43 Million | ▼ -90.7 pp |
| 2000 | 90.7% | €1.47 Million | €136.80K | €5.90 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 1999 | 93.6% | €1.70 Million | €109.25K | €4.70 Million | — |