Imalliance SA (MLIML) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Imalliance SA (MLIML) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 204.3% as of December 2024. Working capital of €-1.36 Million (current assets of €915.85K minus current liabilities of €2.27 Million) is measured against net assets of €-664.72K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Imalliance SA (MLIML) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Imalliance SA Working Capital to Net Assets (1999–2024)
This chart shows how Imalliance SA's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 25 annual periods from 1999 to 2024. As of December 2024, the ratio stands at 204.3%, reflecting working capital of €-1.36 Million against net assets of €-664.72K EUR. See MLIML days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Imalliance SA (1999–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Imalliance SA from 1999 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see MLIML stock market capitalisation.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (EUR) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 204.3% | €-1.36 Million | €-664.72K | €915.85K | €2.27 Million | ▼ -48.6 pp |
| 2023 | 252.9% | €-822.37K | €-325.16K | €863.63K | €1.69 Million | ▲ +320.2 pp |
| 2022 | -67.3% | €-164.74K | €244.72K | €1.31 Million | €1.48 Million | ▼ -98.1 pp |
| 2021 | 30.8% | €70.66K | €229.43K | €1.93 Million | €1.85 Million | ▼ -1923.1 pp |
| 2020 | 1953.9% | €59.48K | €3.04K | €1.93 Million | €1.87 Million | ▲ +2448.3 pp |
| 2019 | -494.4% | €-663.34K | €134.16K | €821.07K | €1.48 Million | ▲ +1077.0 pp |
| 2017 | -1571.4% | €-873.09K | €55.56K | €1.13 Million | €2.00 Million | ▼ -1883.8 pp |
| 2016 | 312.4% | €-1.42 Million | €-454.92K | €845.89K | €2.27 Million | ▲ +562.1 pp |
| 2015 | -249.7% | €-667.20K | €267.19K | €1.89 Million | €2.56 Million | ▲ +26.3 pp |
| 2014 | -276.0% | €-532.96K | €193.10K | €1.70 Million | €2.23 Million | ▼ -236.3 pp |
| 2013 | -39.7% | €-218.44K | €549.86K | €1.67 Million | €1.89 Million | ▼ -70.7 pp |
| 2012 | 31.0% | €235.21K | €758.76K | €1.41 Million | €1.18 Million | ▲ +17.2 pp |
| 2011 | 13.8% | €636.38K | €4.62 Million | €1.94 Million | €1.30 Million | ▼ -38.8 pp |
| 2010 | 52.6% | €753.78K | €1.43 Million | €1.85 Million | €1.10 Million | ▲ +36.0 pp |
| 2009 | 16.7% | €167.32K | €1.00 Million | €1.05 Million | €885.41K | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2008 | 12.2% | €62.25K | €511.86K | €947.64K | €885.38K | ▲ +12.2 pp |
| 2007 | 0.0% | €0.00 | €404.13K | €917.86K | €917.86K | ▲ +15.2 pp |
| 2006 | -15.2% | €-54.04K | €355.11K | €594.42K | €648.45K | ▲ +1484.8 pp |
| 2005 | -1500.0% | €-253.33K | €16.89K | €1.04 Million | €1.29 Million | ▼ -1933.3 pp |
| 2004 | 433.3% | €-478.10K | €-110.33K | €544.30K | €1.02 Million | ▲ +43.3 pp |
| 2003 | 390.0% | €-342.41K | €-87.80K | €842.84K | €1.19 Million | ▲ +372.9 pp |
| 2002 | 17.1% | €-787.44K | €-4.61 Million | €2.16 Million | €2.95 Million | ▼ -71.2 pp |
| 2001 | 88.2% | €-2.72 Million | €-3.09 Million | €930.37K | €3.65 Million | ▲ +83.9 pp |
| 2000 | 4.3% | €63.14K | €1.47 Million | €2.68 Million | €2.62 Million | ▼ -79.9 pp |
| 1999 | 84.2% | €1.43 Million | €1.70 Million | €3.40 Million | €1.97 Million | — |