Rossi Residencial S.A Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Rossi Residencial S.A tangible net worth ratio. Rossi Residencial S.A (RSID3) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 91.2% as of June 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (R$11.43 Million) from net assets (R$130.31 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Rossi Residencial S.A (RSID3) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Rossi Residencial S.A (2000–2017)
Tangible net worth ratio of Rossi Residencial S.A from 2000 to 2017. This chart shows how Rossi Residencial S.A's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2000 to 2017. As of June 2018, the ratio stands at 91.2%, reflecting net assets of R$130.31 Million with intangible assets of R$11.43 Million BRL. Check Rossi Residencial S.A PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Rossi Residencial S.A Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2017)
Rossi Residencial S.A tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2017. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Rossi Residencial S.A from 2000 to 2017, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Rossi Residencial S.A worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (BRL) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 85.6% | R$369.94 Million | R$53.29 Million | R$3.84 Billion | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2016 | 91.6% | R$733.58 Million | R$61.88 Million | R$4.82 Billion | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2015 | 97.7% | R$1.27 Billion | R$29.61 Million | R$5.26 Billion | ▲ +93.8 pp |
| 2014 | 3.8% | R$1.84 Billion | R$1.77 Billion | R$6.79 Billion | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2013 | 7.5% | R$2.46 Billion | R$2.28 Billion | R$7.59 Billion | ▼ -91.1 pp |
| 2012 | 98.6% | R$2.30 Billion | R$31.40 Million | R$8.23 Billion | ▲ +67.5 pp |
| 2011 | 31.1% | R$2.78 Billion | R$1.92 Billion | R$7.45 Billion | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2010 | 39.1% | R$2.52 Billion | R$1.53 Billion | R$5.70 Billion | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2009 | 51.9% | R$2.28 Billion | R$1.10 Billion | R$4.41 Billion | ▼ -7.1 pp |
| 2008 | 59.0% | R$1.24 Billion | R$507.18 Million | R$2.87 Billion | ▼ -40.6 pp |
| 2007 | 99.7% | R$1.17 Billion | R$3.64 Million | R$2.22 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2006 | 99.7% | R$1.08 Billion | R$2.77 Million | R$1.49 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 99.4% | R$292.65 Million | R$1.68 Million | R$695.55 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | R$309.87 Million | R$0.00 | R$941.15 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | R$284.50 Million | R$0.00 | R$721.58 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | R$286.74 Million | R$0.00 | R$608.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | R$188.79 Million | R$0.00 | R$392.79 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | R$197.82 Million | R$0.00 | R$434.16 Million | — |