Rossi Residencial S.A (RSID3) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Rossi Residencial S.A (RSID3) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 91.2% as of June 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (R$11.43 Million) from net assets (R$130.31 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See RSID3 working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Rossi Residencial S.A Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2000–2017)
This chart shows how Rossi Residencial S.A's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2000 to 2017. As of June 2018, the ratio stands at 91.2%, reflecting net assets of R$130.31 Million with intangible assets of R$11.43 Million BRL. See Rossi Residencial S.A defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Rossi Residencial S.A (2000–2017)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Rossi Residencial S.A from 2000 to 2017, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Rossi Residencial S.A.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (BRL) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 85.6% | R$369.94 Million | R$53.29 Million | R$3.84 Billion | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2016 | 91.6% | R$733.58 Million | R$61.88 Million | R$4.82 Billion | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2015 | 97.7% | R$1.27 Billion | R$29.61 Million | R$5.26 Billion | ▲ +93.8 pp |
| 2014 | 3.8% | R$1.84 Billion | R$1.77 Billion | R$6.79 Billion | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2013 | 7.5% | R$2.46 Billion | R$2.28 Billion | R$7.59 Billion | ▼ -91.1 pp |
| 2012 | 98.6% | R$2.30 Billion | R$31.40 Million | R$8.23 Billion | ▲ +67.5 pp |
| 2011 | 31.1% | R$2.78 Billion | R$1.92 Billion | R$7.45 Billion | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2010 | 39.1% | R$2.52 Billion | R$1.53 Billion | R$5.70 Billion | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2009 | 51.9% | R$2.28 Billion | R$1.10 Billion | R$4.41 Billion | ▼ -7.1 pp |
| 2008 | 59.0% | R$1.24 Billion | R$507.18 Million | R$2.87 Billion | ▼ -40.6 pp |
| 2007 | 99.7% | R$1.17 Billion | R$3.64 Million | R$2.22 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2006 | 99.7% | R$1.08 Billion | R$2.77 Million | R$1.49 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 99.4% | R$292.65 Million | R$1.68 Million | R$695.55 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | R$309.87 Million | R$0.00 | R$941.15 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | R$284.50 Million | R$0.00 | R$721.58 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | R$286.74 Million | R$0.00 | R$608.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | R$188.79 Million | R$0.00 | R$392.79 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | R$197.82 Million | R$0.00 | R$434.16 Million | — |