Stora Enso Oyj ser. A (STE-A) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Stora Enso Oyj ser. A (STE-A) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 97.0% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Skr311.34 Million) from net assets (Skr10.33 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See STE-A working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Stora Enso Oyj ser. A Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2025)
This chart shows how Stora Enso Oyj ser. A's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1999 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 97.0%, reflecting net assets of Skr10.33 Billion with intangible assets of Skr311.34 Million SEK. See Stora Enso Oyj ser. A (STE-A) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Stora Enso Oyj ser. A (1999–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Stora Enso Oyj ser. A from 1999 to 2025, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Stora Enso Oyj ser. A (STE-A) market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (SEK) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 97.2% | Skr10.65 Billion | Skr295.00 Million | Skr19.06 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2024 | 96.5% | Skr9.99 Billion | Skr350.00 Million | Skr19.80 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2023 | 96.4% | Skr10.89 Billion | Skr391.00 Million | Skr20.75 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2022 | 98.1% | Skr12.50 Billion | Skr243.00 Million | Skr20.92 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2021 | 97.6% | Skr10.67 Billion | Skr261.00 Million | Skr19.03 Billion | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2020 | 98.1% | Skr8.79 Billion | Skr170.00 Million | Skr17.43 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2019 | 97.2% | Skr7.42 Billion | Skr207.00 Million | Skr15.05 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2018 | 95.8% | Skr6.73 Billion | Skr280.00 Million | Skr12.85 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 96.0% | Skr6.05 Billion | Skr241.00 Million | Skr11.77 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2016 | 96.7% | Skr5.87 Billion | Skr194.00 Million | Skr12.33 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 96.8% | Skr5.51 Billion | Skr176.00 Million | Skr12.36 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2014 | 96.5% | Skr5.24 Billion | Skr184.00 Million | Skr12.85 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2013 | 98.6% | Skr5.27 Billion | Skr72.00 Million | Skr12.75 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2012 | 98.7% | Skr5.88 Billion | Skr74.20 Million | Skr13.69 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 98.3% | Skr5.96 Billion | Skr100.80 Million | Skr13.00 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2010 | 98.5% | Skr6.25 Billion | Skr93.60 Million | Skr13.04 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2009 | 98.1% | Skr5.18 Billion | Skr96.70 Million | Skr11.59 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2008 | 97.4% | Skr5.65 Billion | Skr144.50 Million | Skr12.24 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 97.8% | Skr7.55 Billion | Skr164.30 Million | Skr15.31 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2006 | 96.6% | Skr7.90 Billion | Skr268.50 Million | Skr17.44 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 96.9% | Skr7.74 Billion | Skr237.80 Million | Skr18.09 Billion | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2004 | 98.7% | Skr8.19 Billion | Skr108.10 Million | Skr16.41 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2003 | 99.0% | Skr8.01 Billion | Skr80.40 Million | Skr17.94 Billion | ▲ +12.8 pp |
| 2002 | 86.2% | Skr8.19 Billion | Skr1.13 Billion | Skr18.23 Billion | ▲ +12.4 pp |
| 2001 | 73.8% | Skr10.07 Billion | Skr2.63 Billion | Skr22.90 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2000 | 73.4% | Skr8.74 Billion | Skr2.32 Billion | Skr21.38 Billion | ▼ -18.0 pp |
| 1999 | 91.4% | Skr6.17 Billion | Skr528.24 Million | Skr16.08 Billion | — |