Thule Group AB Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Thule Group AB tangible net worth ratio. Thule Group AB (THULE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (Skr0.00) from net assets (Skr7.23 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Thule Group AB (THULE) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Thule Group AB (2000–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Thule Group AB from 2000 to 2025. This chart shows how Thule Group AB's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of Skr7.23 Billion with intangible assets of Skr0.00 SEK. Check asset allocation strategy of Thule Group AB to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Thule Group AB Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Thule Group AB tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Thule Group AB from 2000 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Thule Group AB (THULE) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (SEK) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | Skr7.23 Billion | Skr0.00 | Skr13.74 Billion | ▲ +15.2 pp |
| 2024 | 84.8% | Skr8.10 Billion | Skr1.23 Billion | Skr14.96 Billion | ▼ -14.8 pp |
| 2023 | 99.6% | Skr6.85 Billion | Skr30.00 Million | Skr10.97 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 99.5% | Skr6.55 Billion | Skr36.00 Million | Skr11.68 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2021 | 99.3% | Skr5.82 Billion | Skr38.00 Million | Skr10.19 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2020 | 99.2% | Skr5.25 Billion | Skr40.00 Million | Skr8.45 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 99.0% | Skr4.33 Billion | Skr44.00 Million | Skr8.29 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 99.3% | Skr4.01 Billion | Skr28.00 Million | Skr7.70 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 99.1% | Skr3.47 Billion | Skr32.00 Million | Skr7.29 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 99.2% | Skr3.83 Billion | Skr32.00 Million | Skr7.88 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 99.1% | Skr3.23 Billion | Skr29.00 Million | Skr6.90 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2014 | 98.5% | Skr2.97 Billion | Skr44.00 Million | Skr6.95 Billion | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2013 | 92.4% | Skr1.80 Billion | Skr137.00 Million | Skr8.04 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2012 | 95.5% | Skr1.68 Billion | Skr75.00 Million | Skr8.33 Billion | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2011 | 98.0% | Skr1.54 Billion | Skr31.00 Million | Skr8.48 Billion | ▲ +342.0 pp |
| 2010 | -244.0% | Skr1.34 Billion | Skr4.61 Billion | Skr8.15 Billion | ▲ +102.1 pp |
| 2009 | -346.1% | Skr1.17 Billion | Skr5.20 Billion | Skr9.02 Billion | ▼ -34.3 pp |
| 2006 | -311.8% | Skr1.20 Billion | Skr4.96 Billion | Skr8.31 Billion | ▼ -17.6 pp |
| 2005 | -294.2% | Skr988.00 Million | Skr3.90 Billion | Skr5.98 Billion | ▼ -79.2 pp |
| 2004 | -215.0% | Skr1.06 Billion | Skr3.35 Billion | Skr5.33 Billion | ▼ -204.3 pp |
| 2003 | -10.7% | Skr766.00 Million | Skr848.00 Million | Skr1.88 Billion | ▲ +14.3 pp |
| 2002 | -25.0% | Skr723.00 Million | Skr904.00 Million | Skr1.96 Billion | ▲ +16.4 pp |
| 2001 | -41.5% | Skr680.00 Million | Skr962.00 Million | Skr2.10 Billion | ▲ +25.6 pp |
| 2000 | -67.1% | Skr604.00 Million | Skr1.01 Billion | Skr2.41 Billion | — |