Intergama Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Intergama tangible net worth ratio. Intergama (INTR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of December 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (ILA0.00) from net assets (ILA38.56 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check how strategically is Intergama's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Intergama (2000–2019)
Tangible net worth ratio of Intergama from 2000 to 2019. This chart shows how Intergama's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2000 to 2019. As of December 2019, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of ILA38.56 Million with intangible assets of ILA0.00 ILA. See Intergama (INTR) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Intergama Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2000–2019)
Intergama tangible net worth ratio by year from 2000 to 2019. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Intergama from 2000 to 2019, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Intergama market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (ILA) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 100.0% | ILA38.56 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA65.23 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | ILA25.98 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA56.82 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | ILA249.59 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA324.74 Million | ▲ +80.1 pp |
| 2016 | 19.9% | ILA238.99 Million | ILA191.39 Million | ILA1.28 Billion | ▼ -79.1 pp |
| 2015 | 99.0% | ILA126.07 Million | ILA1.30 Million | ILA871.80 Million | ▲ +32.0 pp |
| 2014 | 67.0% | ILA270.74 Million | ILA89.47 Million | ILA930.01 Million | ▼ -6.4 pp |
| 2013 | 73.4% | ILA289.47 Million | ILA77.01 Million | ILA854.34 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2012 | 73.9% | ILA429.40 Million | ILA112.09 Million | ILA1.13 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 74.3% | ILA423.90 Million | ILA108.86 Million | ILA1.14 Billion | ▲ +4.4 pp |
| 2010 | 70.0% | ILA408.70 Million | ILA122.74 Million | ILA1.17 Billion | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2009 | 72.3% | ILA449.41 Million | ILA124.56 Million | ILA1.16 Billion | ▼ -6.9 pp |
| 2008 | 79.2% | ILA461.46 Million | ILA96.04 Million | ILA1.15 Billion | ▼ -9.3 pp |
| 2007 | 88.5% | ILA480.92 Million | ILA55.44 Million | ILA1.11 Billion | ▼ -8.6 pp |
| 2006 | 97.1% | ILA420.48 Million | ILA12.21 Million | ILA820.10 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | ILA99.30 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA445.79 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | ILA92.25 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA428.87 Million | — |