Jerusalem (JBNK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Jerusalem (JBNK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (ILA0.00) from net assets (ILA1.65 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Jerusalem working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Jerusalem Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2004–2025)
This chart shows how Jerusalem's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 22 annual periods from 2004 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of ILA1.65 Billion with intangible assets of ILA0.00 ILA. See defensive interval ratio of Jerusalem to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Jerusalem (2004–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Jerusalem from 2004 to 2025, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see JBNK market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (ILA) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | ILA1.65 Billion | ILA0.00 | ILA23.10 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | ILA1.50 Billion | ILA0.00 | ILA22.39 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | ILA1.37 Billion | ILA0.00 | ILA21.83 Billion | ▲ +13.0 pp |
| 2022 | 87.0% | ILA1.26 Billion | ILA163.30 Million | ILA18.91 Billion | ▼ -13.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | ILA1.13 Billion | ILA0.00 | ILA16.84 Billion | ▲ +13.5 pp |
| 2020 | 86.5% | ILA1.00 Billion | ILA135.30 Million | ILA14.90 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2019 | 86.4% | ILA961.50 Million | ILA130.70 Million | ILA14.30 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2018 | 85.3% | ILA895.20 Million | ILA131.70 Million | ILA13.29 Billion | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | ILA837.30 Million | ILA400.00K | ILA13.55 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 99.9% | ILA808.30 Million | ILA800.00K | ILA14.20 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 99.8% | ILA784.00 Million | ILA1.20 Million | ILA14.22 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 99.8% | ILA750.40 Million | ILA1.60 Million | ILA14.08 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 99.7% | ILA697.20 Million | ILA2.00 Million | ILA13.47 Billion | ▲ +9.9 pp |
| 2012 | 89.8% | ILA694.10 Million | ILA70.80 Million | ILA12.29 Billion | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2011 | 95.5% | ILA644.60 Million | ILA29.10 Million | ILA11.48 Billion | ▼ -4.5 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | ILA633.20 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA10.13 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | ILA605.90 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA9.30 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | ILA519.90 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA9.25 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | ILA502.40 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA8.98 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | ILA461.70 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA8.19 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | ILA411.40 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA7.68 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | ILA384.10 Million | ILA0.00 | ILA7.18 Billion | — |