Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc tangible net worth ratio. Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc (BRE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -4025.3% as of December 2012. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$86.51 Million) from net assets (CA$2.10 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See BRE net asset quality score to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc (2003–2012)
Tangible net worth ratio of Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc from 2003 to 2012. This chart shows how Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 10 annual periods from 2003 to 2012. As of December 2012, the ratio stands at -4025.3%, reflecting net assets of CA$2.10 Million with intangible assets of CA$86.51 Million CAD. See how liquid is Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2003–2012)
Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 2003 to 2012. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc from 2003 to 2012, covering 10 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see BRE stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | -4025.3% | CA$2.10 Million | CA$86.51 Million | CA$100.43 Million | ▼ -3101.9 pp |
| 2011 | -923.3% | CA$9.60 Million | CA$98.20 Million | CA$111.50 Million | ▼ -812.2 pp |
| 2010 | -111.1% | CA$49.37 Million | CA$104.22 Million | CA$113.32 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2009 | -87.9% | CA$61.10 Million | CA$114.84 Million | CA$124.95 Million | ▼ -18.8 pp |
| 2008 | -69.2% | CA$74.86 Million | CA$126.65 Million | CA$137.94 Million | ▼ -33.3 pp |
| 2007 | -35.9% | CA$86.31 Million | CA$117.28 Million | CA$129.45 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2006 | -35.2% | CA$91.76 Million | CA$124.03 Million | CA$134.29 Million | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2005 | -30.0% | CA$102.29 Million | CA$133.02 Million | CA$146.16 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2004 | -24.3% | CA$110.44 Million | CA$137.24 Million | CA$143.95 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2003 | -25.1% | CA$120.52 Million | CA$150.76 Million | CA$154.41 Million | — |