Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc (BRE) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc (BRE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -4025.3% as of December 2012. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$86.51 Million) from net assets (CA$2.10 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc book value and equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2003–2012)
This chart shows how Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 10 annual periods from 2003 to 2012. As of December 2012, the ratio stands at -4025.3%, reflecting net assets of CA$2.10 Million with intangible assets of CA$86.51 Million CAD. Also explore Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc (2003–2012)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc from 2003 to 2012, covering 10 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Bridgemarq Real Estate Services Inc worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | -4025.3% | CA$2.10 Million | CA$86.51 Million | CA$100.43 Million | ▼ -3101.9 pp |
| 2011 | -923.3% | CA$9.60 Million | CA$98.20 Million | CA$111.50 Million | ▼ -812.2 pp |
| 2010 | -111.1% | CA$49.37 Million | CA$104.22 Million | CA$113.32 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2009 | -87.9% | CA$61.10 Million | CA$114.84 Million | CA$124.95 Million | ▼ -18.8 pp |
| 2008 | -69.2% | CA$74.86 Million | CA$126.65 Million | CA$137.94 Million | ▼ -33.3 pp |
| 2007 | -35.9% | CA$86.31 Million | CA$117.28 Million | CA$129.45 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2006 | -35.2% | CA$91.76 Million | CA$124.03 Million | CA$134.29 Million | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2005 | -30.0% | CA$102.29 Million | CA$133.02 Million | CA$146.16 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2004 | -24.3% | CA$110.44 Million | CA$137.24 Million | CA$143.95 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2003 | -25.1% | CA$120.52 Million | CA$150.76 Million | CA$154.41 Million | — |