KGHM Polska Miedz SA (KGH) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
KGHM Polska Miedz SA (KGH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.4% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (zł181.00 Million) from net assets (zł32.90 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See KGHM Polska Miedz SA current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
KGHM Polska Miedz SA Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2004–2025)
This chart shows how KGHM Polska Miedz SA's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 22 annual periods from 2004 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 99.4%, reflecting net assets of zł32.90 Billion with intangible assets of zł181.00 Million PLN. See KGHM Polska Miedz SA (KGH) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for KGHM Polska Miedz SA (2004–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for KGHM Polska Miedz SA from 2004 to 2025, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is KGHM Polska Miedz SA worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (PLN) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.4% | zł32.90 Billion | zł181.00 Million | zł58.24 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2024 | 99.3% | zł31.06 Billion | zł213.00 Million | zł53.89 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2023 | 98.9% | zł28.63 Billion | zł313.00 Million | zł51.38 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2022 | 99.3% | zł32.15 Billion | zł218.00 Million | zł53.44 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2021 | 99.1% | zł27.14 Billion | zł250.00 Million | zł48.03 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 99.3% | zł21.08 Billion | zł141.00 Million | zł42.78 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2019 | 99.2% | zł20.20 Billion | zł155.00 Million | zł39.41 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2018 | 98.8% | zł19.23 Billion | zł224.00 Million | zł37.24 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 98.8% | zł17.79 Billion | zł209.00 Million | zł34.12 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 98.7% | zł15.91 Billion | zł208.00 Million | zł33.44 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 98.8% | zł20.41 Billion | zł241.00 Million | zł36.76 Billion | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2014 | 97.1% | zł25.53 Billion | zł743.00 Million | zł40.37 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 97.5% | zł23.30 Billion | zł576.00 Million | zł29.04 Billion | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2012 | 91.2% | zł21.92 Billion | zł1.92 Billion | zł28.18 Billion | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2011 | 97.4% | zł23.38 Billion | zł613.99 Million | zł30.55 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2010 | 99.4% | zł14.46 Billion | zł86.72 Million | zł19.83 Billion | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2009 | 97.5% | zł10.62 Billion | zł268.19 Million | zł14.90 Billion | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2008 | 98.6% | zł10.98 Billion | zł151.58 Million | zł15.00 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 98.7% | zł9.50 Billion | zł119.23 Million | zł13.46 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 98.5% | zł8.26 Billion | zł125.61 Million | zł12.99 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 98.6% | zł6.36 Billion | zł89.25 Million | zł11.10 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2004 | 98.4% | zł5.66 Billion | zł90.11 Million | zł9.36 Billion | — |