John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund working capital to net assets ratio. John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund (JHS) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -61.4% as of April 2026. Working capital of $-87.24 Million (current assets of $4.06 Million minus current liabilities of $91.30 Million) is measured against net assets of $142.15 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund (2012–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund from 2012 to 2024. This chart shows how John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 13 annual periods from 2012 to 2024. As of April 2026, the ratio stands at -61.4%, reflecting working capital of $-87.24 Million against net assets of $142.15 Million USD. Explore long-term investment intensity of John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fu to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2012–2024)
John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2012 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fund from 2012 to 2024, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see John Hancock Income Securities Closed Fu assets under control.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6.6% | $9.25 Million | $141.11 Million | $10.72 Million | $1.47 Million | ▲ +8.0 pp |
| 2023 | -1.5% | $-1.90 Million | $127.63 Million | $9.96 Million | $11.87 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2022 | 1.7% | $2.31 Million | $132.19 Million | $20.24 Million | $17.93 Million | ▲ +56.6 pp |
| 2021 | -54.9% | $-101.57 Million | $185.16 Million | $2.77 Million | $104.34 Million | ▼ -55.7 pp |
| 2020 | 0.8% | $1.49 Million | $185.77 Million | $2.55 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2019 | -0.9% | $-1.56 Million | $181.35 Million | $4.49 Million | $6.05 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2018 | 1.1% | $1.89 Million | $165.63 Million | $2.54 Million | $657.43K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2017 | -0.1% | $-145.35K | $181.37 Million | $18.45 Million | $18.60 Million | ▲ +48.9 pp |
| 2016 | -49.0% | $-88.46 Million | $180.55 Million | $3.46 Million | $91.92 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2015 | -48.8% | $-86.14 Million | $176.39 Million | $6.45 Million | $92.60 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2014 | -47.8% | $-88.88 Million | $185.96 Million | $3.39 Million | $92.27 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2013 | -47.5% | $-85.73 Million | $180.54 Million | $6.53 Million | $92.26 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2012 | -46.2% | $-85.75 Million | $185.79 Million | $4.92 Million | $90.67 Million | — |