Bank Polska Kasa Opieki SA (PEO) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Bank Polska Kasa Opieki SA (PEO) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 42.6% as of June 2026. Working capital of zł14.01 Billion (current assets of zł18.95 Billion minus current liabilities of zł4.94 Billion) is measured against net assets of zł32.89 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See PEO days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Bank Polska Kasa Opieki SA Working Capital to Net Assets (2005–2025)
This chart shows how Bank Polska Kasa Opieki SA's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 42.6%, reflecting working capital of zł14.01 Billion against net assets of zł32.89 Billion PLN. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Bank Polska Kasa Opieki SA balance sheet assets.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Bank Polska Kasa Opieki SA (2005–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Bank Polska Kasa Opieki SA from 2005 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check PEO financial resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (PLN) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35.2% | zł12.43 Billion | zł35.36 Billion | zł24.23 Billion | zł11.80 Billion | ▲ +803.4 pp |
| 2024 | -768.2% | zł-245.18 Billion | zł31.91 Billion | zł18.02 Billion | zł263.20 Billion | ▼ -202.9 pp |
| 2023 | -565.4% | zł-171.54 Billion | zł30.34 Billion | zł14.73 Billion | zł186.27 Billion | ▲ +286.6 pp |
| 2022 | -852.0% | zł-194.04 Billion | zł22.77 Billion | zł20.74 Billion | zł214.77 Billion | ▼ -49.8 pp |
| 2021 | -802.2% | zł-191.42 Billion | zł23.86 Billion | zł7.21 Billion | zł198.64 Billion | ▼ -117.1 pp |
| 2020 | -685.1% | zł-174.67 Billion | zł25.49 Billion | zł6.88 Billion | zł181.55 Billion | ▼ -11.4 pp |
| 2019 | -673.7% | zł-157.64 Billion | zł23.40 Billion | zł7.43 Billion | zł165.08 Billion | ▼ -59.5 pp |
| 2018 | -614.2% | zł-140.10 Billion | zł22.81 Billion | zł15.41 Billion | zł155.51 Billion | ▼ -14.2 pp |
| 2017 | -600.1% | zł-139.63 Billion | zł23.27 Billion | zł7.95 Billion | zł147.57 Billion | ▼ -32.7 pp |
| 2016 | -567.4% | zł-130.01 Billion | zł22.91 Billion | zł8.33 Billion | zł138.34 Billion | ▼ -75.0 pp |
| 2015 | -492.4% | zł-115.34 Billion | zł23.42 Billion | zł11.38 Billion | zł126.72 Billion | ▼ -36.2 pp |
| 2014 | -456.2% | zł-109.69 Billion | zł24.05 Billion | zł12.97 Billion | zł122.67 Billion | ▲ +18.4 pp |
| 2013 | -474.6% | zł-111.59 Billion | zł23.51 Billion | zł7.28 Billion | zł118.87 Billion | ▼ -71.8 pp |
| 2012 | -402.8% | zł-93.70 Billion | zł23.26 Billion | zł11.96 Billion | zł105.66 Billion | ▲ +104.4 pp |
| 2011 | -507.2% | zł-107.38 Billion | zł21.17 Billion | zł6.92 Billion | zł114.31 Billion | ▼ -42.0 pp |
| 2010 | -465.2% | zł-94.23 Billion | zł20.26 Billion | zł7.89 Billion | zł102.12 Billion | ▲ +23.5 pp |
| 2009 | -488.6% | zł-89.77 Billion | zł18.37 Billion | zł11.42 Billion | zł101.19 Billion | ▲ +23.6 pp |
| 2008 | -512.3% | zł-82.15 Billion | zł16.04 Billion | zł11.81 Billion | zł93.96 Billion | ▲ +55.4 pp |
| 2007 | -567.7% | zł-83.71 Billion | zł14.75 Billion | zł7.99 Billion | zł91.70 Billion | ▼ -39.7 pp |
| 2006 | -528.0% | zł-46.95 Billion | zł8.89 Billion | zł4.53 Billion | zł51.48 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2005 | -524.9% | zł-44.21 Billion | zł8.42 Billion | zł4.27 Billion | zł48.48 Billion | — |