Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.13x as of July 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($5.79 Million) in capital expenditures ($771.00K). Check Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1989–2025)
This chart tracks Kewaunee Scientific Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KEQU cash flow metrics.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation from 1989 to 2025. See cash generation quality of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $14.78 Million | $2.17 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $19.56 Million | $4.37 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2021 | 2.63x | $912.00K | $2.40 Million | ▲ +343.7% |
| 2020 | 0.59x | $4.16 Million | $2.46 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2019 | 1.69x | $2.49 Million | $4.21 Million | ▲ +58.6% |
| 2018 | 1.07x | $3.18 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +376.4% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $11.66 Million | $2.61 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $7.27 Million | $2.19 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2015 | 1.12x | $2.29 Million | $2.57 Million | ▲ +347.5% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $8.07 Million | $2.02 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2013 | 0.63x | $3.83 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +203.2% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $6.92 Million | $1.44 Million | ▼ -95.0% |
| 2011 | 4.13x | $1.27 Million | $5.25 Million | ▲ +341.5% |
| 2010 | 0.94x | $4.53 Million | $4.24 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2009 | 0.71x | $2.10 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2008 | 0.75x | $3.39 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +279.1% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $8.71 Million | $1.72 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $3.14 Million | $976.00K | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2003 | 2.42x | $1.30 Million | $3.14 Million | ▲ +422.5% |
| 2002 | 0.46x | $4.46 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2001 | 0.71x | $2.37 Million | $1.68 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2000 | 1.53x | $2.19 Million | $3.35 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 1999 | 2.85x | $1.30 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +545.1% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $3.40 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 1997 | 0.29x | $4.20 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $3.10 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -61.7% |
| 1994 | 0.42x | $1.90 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -67.6% |
| 1993 | 1.30x | $1.00 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 1991 | 1.00x | $2.30 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +660.0% |
| 1990 | 0.13x | $3.80 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -21.1% |
| 1989 | 0.17x | $4.80 Million | $800.00K | — |