Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.36 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Kewaunee Scientific Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. Check KEQU cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $14.78 Million | $128.41 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $19.56 Million | $78.56 Million | ▲ +628.4% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-3.79 Million | $80.41 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-7.88 Million | $82.59 Million | ▼ -601.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $912.00K | $47.90 Million | ▼ -79.3% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $4.16 Million | $45.23 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $2.49 Million | $39.52 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $3.18 Million | $36.84 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $11.66 Million | $36.26 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $7.27 Million | $33.85 Million | ▲ +221.5% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $2.29 Million | $34.29 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $8.07 Million | $28.49 Million | ▲ +159.4% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $3.83 Million | $35.05 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $6.92 Million | $32.48 Million | ▲ +403.8% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $1.27 Million | $30.04 Million | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $4.53 Million | $24.95 Million | ▲ +110.0% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $2.10 Million | $24.27 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $3.39 Million | $21.89 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | $8.71 Million | $20.01 Million | ▲ +4363.3% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-246.00K | $24.11 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $3.14 Million | $19.62 Million | ▲ +236.4% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-2.78 Million | $23.67 Million | ▼ -260.1% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $1.30 Million | $17.72 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $4.46 Million | $15.28 Million | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $2.37 Million | $15.11 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $2.19 Million | $14.18 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $1.30 Million | $14.00 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $3.40 Million | $12.90 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $4.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $3.10 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +1460.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-300.00K | $15.80 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $1.90 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +90.0% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $1.00 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +169.0% |
| 1992 | -0.09x | $-1.60 Million | $18.10 Million | ▼ -171.5% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $2.30 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 1990 | 0.20x | $3.80 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 1989 | 0.24x | $4.80 Million | $19.60 Million | — |