Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.36 Million) in one year. Check KEQU capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore KEQU total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KEQU market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $14.78 Million | $128.41 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $19.56 Million | $78.56 Million | ▲ +628.4% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-3.79 Million | $80.41 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-7.88 Million | $82.59 Million | ▼ -601.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $912.00K | $47.90 Million | ▼ -79.3% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $4.16 Million | $45.23 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $2.49 Million | $39.52 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $3.18 Million | $36.84 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $11.66 Million | $36.26 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $7.27 Million | $33.85 Million | ▲ +221.5% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $2.29 Million | $34.29 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $8.07 Million | $28.49 Million | ▲ +159.4% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $3.83 Million | $35.05 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $6.92 Million | $32.48 Million | ▲ +403.8% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $1.27 Million | $30.04 Million | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $4.53 Million | $24.95 Million | ▲ +110.0% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $2.10 Million | $24.27 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $3.39 Million | $21.89 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | $8.71 Million | $20.01 Million | ▲ +4363.3% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-246.00K | $24.11 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $3.14 Million | $19.62 Million | ▲ +236.4% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-2.78 Million | $23.67 Million | ▼ -260.1% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $1.30 Million | $17.72 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $4.46 Million | $15.28 Million | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $2.37 Million | $15.11 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $2.19 Million | $14.18 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $1.30 Million | $14.00 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $3.40 Million | $12.90 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $4.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $3.10 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +1460.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-300.00K | $15.80 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $1.90 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +90.0% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $1.00 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +169.0% |
| 1992 | -0.09x | $-1.60 Million | $18.10 Million | ▼ -171.5% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $2.30 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 1990 | 0.20x | $3.80 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 1989 | 0.24x | $4.80 Million | $19.60 Million | — |