Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of July 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($98.58 Million) in one year. Check Kewaunee Scientific Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1989–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation from 1989 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation across 38 annual periods. Check KEQU cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2026)
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Kewaunee Scientific Corporation generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.18x | $18.63 Million | $101.50 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2025 | 0.12x | $14.78 Million | $128.41 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $19.56 Million | $78.56 Million | ▲ +628.4% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-3.79 Million | $80.41 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-7.88 Million | $82.59 Million | ▼ -601.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $912.00K | $47.90 Million | ▼ -79.3% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $4.16 Million | $45.23 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $2.49 Million | $39.52 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $3.18 Million | $36.84 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $11.66 Million | $36.26 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $7.27 Million | $33.85 Million | ▲ +221.5% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $2.29 Million | $34.29 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $8.07 Million | $28.49 Million | ▲ +159.4% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $3.83 Million | $35.05 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $6.92 Million | $32.48 Million | ▲ +403.8% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $1.27 Million | $30.04 Million | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $4.53 Million | $24.95 Million | ▲ +110.0% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $2.10 Million | $24.27 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $3.39 Million | $21.89 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | $8.71 Million | $20.01 Million | ▲ +4363.3% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-246.00K | $24.11 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $3.14 Million | $19.62 Million | ▲ +236.4% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-2.78 Million | $23.67 Million | ▼ -260.1% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $1.30 Million | $17.72 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $4.46 Million | $15.28 Million | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $2.37 Million | $15.11 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $2.19 Million | $14.18 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $1.30 Million | $14.00 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $3.40 Million | $12.90 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $4.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $3.10 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +1460.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-300.00K | $15.80 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $1.90 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +90.0% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $1.00 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +169.0% |
| 1992 | -0.09x | $-1.60 Million | $18.10 Million | ▼ -171.5% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $2.30 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 1990 | 0.20x | $3.80 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 1989 | 0.24x | $4.80 Million | $19.60 Million | — |