Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.36 Million) in one year. See KEQU FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $14.78 Million | $128.41 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $19.56 Million | $78.56 Million | ▲ +628.4% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-3.79 Million | $80.41 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-7.88 Million | $82.59 Million | ▼ -601.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $912.00K | $47.90 Million | ▼ -79.3% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $4.16 Million | $45.23 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $2.49 Million | $39.52 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $3.18 Million | $36.84 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $11.66 Million | $36.26 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $7.27 Million | $33.85 Million | ▲ +221.5% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $2.29 Million | $34.29 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $8.07 Million | $28.49 Million | ▲ +159.4% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $3.83 Million | $35.05 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $6.92 Million | $32.48 Million | ▲ +403.8% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $1.27 Million | $30.04 Million | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $4.53 Million | $24.95 Million | ▲ +110.0% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $2.10 Million | $24.27 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $3.39 Million | $21.89 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | $8.71 Million | $20.01 Million | ▲ +4363.3% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-246.00K | $24.11 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $3.14 Million | $19.62 Million | ▲ +236.4% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-2.78 Million | $23.67 Million | ▼ -260.1% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $1.30 Million | $17.72 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $4.46 Million | $15.28 Million | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $2.37 Million | $15.11 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $2.19 Million | $14.18 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $1.30 Million | $14.00 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $3.40 Million | $12.90 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $4.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $3.10 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +1460.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-300.00K | $15.80 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $1.90 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +90.0% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $1.00 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +169.0% |
| 1992 | -0.09x | $-1.60 Million | $18.10 Million | ▼ -171.5% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $2.30 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 1990 | 0.20x | $3.80 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 1989 | 0.24x | $4.80 Million | $19.60 Million | — |