Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation cash flow quality index. Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.16x as of July 2026. Operating cash flow of $1.98 Million exceeds net income of $1.71 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See Kewaunee Scientific Corporation financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1989–2026)
Cash flow quality index of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation from 1989 to 2026. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore how well can Kewaunee Scientific Corporation service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1989–2026)
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation cash flow quality index by year from 1989 to 2026. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Kewaunee Scientific Corporation cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.78x | $18.63 Million | $10.46 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2025 | 1.28x | $14.78 Million | $11.58 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2024 | 1.04x | $19.56 Million | $18.75 Million | ▲ +137.4% |
| 2023 | -2.79x | $-3.79 Million | $1.36 Million | ▼ -289.1% |
| 2019 | 1.48x | $2.49 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2018 | 0.59x | $3.18 Million | $5.37 Million | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2017 | 2.52x | $11.66 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2016 | 1.88x | $7.27 Million | $3.88 Million | ▲ +198.0% |
| 2015 | 0.63x | $2.29 Million | $3.64 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2014 | 2.02x | $8.07 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2013 | 1.04x | $3.83 Million | $3.68 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2012 | 3.85x | $6.92 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +534.9% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $1.27 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2010 | 1.21x | $4.53 Million | $3.75 Million | ▲ +144.5% |
| 2009 | 0.49x | $2.10 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2008 | 1.08x | $3.39 Million | $3.13 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2007 | 5.65x | $8.71 Million | $1.54 Million | ▲ +543.5% |
| 2006 | -1.27x | $-246.00K | $193.00K | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2004 | -1.90x | $-2.78 Million | $1.46 Million | ▼ -181.0% |
| 2002 | 2.35x | $4.46 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2001 | 1.85x | $2.37 Million | $1.28 Million | ▲ +200.6% |
| 2000 | 0.62x | $2.19 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +61.2% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $1.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 1998 | 1.31x | $3.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 1997 | 1.83x | $4.20 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 1996 | 7.75x | $3.10 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +487.5% |
| 1992 | -2.00x | $-1.60 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -108.7% |
| 1991 | 23.00x | $2.30 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +202.6% |
| 1990 | 7.60x | $3.80 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +169.2% |
| 1989 | 2.82x | $4.80 Million | $1.70 Million | — |