Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -1.68x as of October 2025. Operating cash flow of $-4.26 Million is below net income of $2.54 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore Kewaunee Scientific Corporation operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1989–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check KEQU cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see KEQU market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.28x | $14.78 Million | $11.58 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2024 | 1.04x | $19.56 Million | $18.75 Million | ▲ +137.4% |
| 2023 | -2.79x | $-3.79 Million | $1.36 Million | ▼ -289.1% |
| 2019 | 1.48x | $2.49 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2018 | 0.59x | $3.18 Million | $5.37 Million | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2017 | 2.52x | $11.66 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2016 | 1.88x | $7.27 Million | $3.88 Million | ▲ +198.0% |
| 2015 | 0.63x | $2.29 Million | $3.64 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2014 | 2.02x | $8.07 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2013 | 1.04x | $3.83 Million | $3.68 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2012 | 3.85x | $6.92 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +534.9% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $1.27 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2010 | 1.21x | $4.53 Million | $3.75 Million | ▲ +144.5% |
| 2009 | 0.49x | $2.10 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2008 | 1.08x | $3.39 Million | $3.13 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2007 | 5.65x | $8.71 Million | $1.54 Million | ▲ +543.5% |
| 2006 | -1.27x | $-246.00K | $193.00K | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2004 | -1.90x | $-2.78 Million | $1.46 Million | ▼ -181.0% |
| 2002 | 2.35x | $4.46 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2001 | 1.85x | $2.37 Million | $1.28 Million | ▲ +200.6% |
| 2000 | 0.62x | $2.19 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +61.2% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $1.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 1998 | 1.31x | $3.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 1997 | 1.83x | $4.20 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 1996 | 7.75x | $3.10 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +487.5% |
| 1992 | -2.00x | $-1.60 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -108.7% |
| 1991 | 23.00x | $2.30 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +202.6% |
| 1990 | 7.60x | $3.80 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +169.2% |
| 1989 | 2.82x | $4.80 Million | $1.70 Million | — |