Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -1.68x as of October 2025. Operating cash flow of $-4.26 Million is below net income of $2.54 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore KEQU cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1989–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KEQU cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.28x | $14.78 Million | $11.58 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2024 | 1.04x | $19.56 Million | $18.75 Million | ▲ +137.4% |
| 2023 | -2.79x | $-3.79 Million | $1.36 Million | ▼ -289.1% |
| 2019 | 1.48x | $2.49 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2018 | 0.59x | $3.18 Million | $5.37 Million | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2017 | 2.52x | $11.66 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2016 | 1.88x | $7.27 Million | $3.88 Million | ▲ +198.0% |
| 2015 | 0.63x | $2.29 Million | $3.64 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2014 | 2.02x | $8.07 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2013 | 1.04x | $3.83 Million | $3.68 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2012 | 3.85x | $6.92 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +534.9% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $1.27 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2010 | 1.21x | $4.53 Million | $3.75 Million | ▲ +144.5% |
| 2009 | 0.49x | $2.10 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2008 | 1.08x | $3.39 Million | $3.13 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2007 | 5.65x | $8.71 Million | $1.54 Million | ▲ +543.5% |
| 2006 | -1.27x | $-246.00K | $193.00K | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2004 | -1.90x | $-2.78 Million | $1.46 Million | ▼ -181.0% |
| 2002 | 2.35x | $4.46 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2001 | 1.85x | $2.37 Million | $1.28 Million | ▲ +200.6% |
| 2000 | 0.62x | $2.19 Million | $3.56 Million | ▲ +61.2% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $1.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 1998 | 1.31x | $3.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 1997 | 1.83x | $4.20 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 1996 | 7.75x | $3.10 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +487.5% |
| 1992 | -2.00x | $-1.60 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -108.7% |
| 1991 | 23.00x | $2.30 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +202.6% |
| 1990 | 7.60x | $3.80 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +169.2% |
| 1989 | 2.82x | $4.80 Million | $1.70 Million | — |