Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation working capital to net assets ratio. Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 73.4% as of July 2026. Working capital of $56.72 Million (current assets of $103.95 Million minus current liabilities of $47.23 Million) is measured against net assets of $77.22 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check KEQU tangible net assets ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (1986–2026)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation from 1986 to 2026. This chart shows how Kewaunee Scientific Corporation's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 41 annual periods from 1986 to 2026. As of July 2026, the ratio stands at 73.4%, reflecting working capital of $56.72 Million against net assets of $77.22 Million USD. See defensive interval ratio of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1986–2026)
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1986 to 2026. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Kewaunee Scientific Corporation from 1986 to 2026, covering 41 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Kewaunee Scientific Corporation assets under control.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 74.3% | $57.05 Million | $76.81 Million | $105.40 Million | $48.35 Million | ▼ -23.3 pp |
| 2025 | 97.6% | $64.65 Million | $66.25 Million | $118.36 Million | $53.71 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2024 | 99.7% | $56.04 Million | $56.21 Million | $96.82 Million | $40.78 Million | ▼ -24.7 pp |
| 2023 | 124.4% | $47.87 Million | $38.48 Million | $87.92 Million | $40.05 Million | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2022 | 136.2% | $49.27 Million | $36.18 Million | $91.56 Million | $42.29 Million | ▲ +72.9 pp |
| 2021 | 63.3% | $26.28 Million | $41.49 Million | $60.46 Million | $34.18 Million | ▼ -6.9 pp |
| 2020 | 70.2% | $27.17 Million | $38.70 Million | $54.23 Million | $27.06 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2019 | 68.4% | $32.62 Million | $47.70 Million | $65.36 Million | $32.73 Million | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2018 | 75.6% | $35.94 Million | $47.52 Million | $63.50 Million | $27.56 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2017 | 74.5% | $32.88 Million | $44.14 Million | $59.81 Million | $26.93 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2016 | 77.8% | $30.01 Million | $38.55 Million | $50.96 Million | $20.95 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2015 | 78.7% | $27.71 Million | $35.20 Million | $48.76 Million | $21.05 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2014 | 79.4% | $27.19 Million | $34.22 Million | $43.35 Million | $16.16 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2013 | 74.5% | $25.11 Million | $33.69 Million | $47.23 Million | $22.11 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2012 | 73.8% | $23.36 Million | $31.66 Million | $43.60 Million | $20.24 Million | ▲ +6.8 pp |
| 2011 | 67.0% | $22.11 Million | $33.02 Million | $42.38 Million | $20.26 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2010 | 63.4% | $20.09 Million | $31.67 Million | $38.58 Million | $18.50 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2009 | 66.8% | $18.88 Million | $28.26 Million | $37.55 Million | $18.66 Million | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2008 | 55.4% | $15.92 Million | $28.71 Million | $33.18 Million | $17.26 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2007 | 48.9% | $12.33 Million | $25.23 Million | $28.51 Million | $16.18 Million | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2006 | 41.8% | $11.03 Million | $26.36 Million | $31.40 Million | $20.37 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2005 | 39.0% | $10.38 Million | $26.59 Million | $26.78 Million | $16.40 Million | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 2004 | 47.1% | $12.62 Million | $26.79 Million | $31.54 Million | $18.92 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2003 | 44.9% | $11.66 Million | $25.94 Million | $24.99 Million | $13.33 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2002 | 55.1% | $14.82 Million | $26.91 Million | $25.43 Million | $10.61 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2001 | 57.0% | $14.69 Million | $25.76 Million | $24.66 Million | $9.97 Million | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2000 | 45.6% | $11.47 Million | $25.14 Million | $23.03 Million | $11.56 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1999 | 45.9% | $10.10 Million | $22.00 Million | $21.80 Million | $11.70 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 1998 | 50.5% | $9.60 Million | $19.00 Million | $20.90 Million | $11.30 Million | ▲ +8.4 pp |
| 1997 | 42.2% | $7.00 Million | $16.60 Million | $16.50 Million | $9.50 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 1996 | 34.5% | $5.00 Million | $14.50 Million | $15.60 Million | $10.60 Million | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 1995 | 47.2% | $6.70 Million | $14.20 Million | $18.40 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 1994 | 46.7% | $7.10 Million | $15.20 Million | $19.00 Million | $11.90 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 1993 | 42.2% | $6.50 Million | $15.40 Million | $18.30 Million | $11.80 Million | ▼ -15.6 pp |
| 1992 | 57.8% | $10.40 Million | $18.00 Million | $22.30 Million | $11.90 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 1991 | 65.3% | $12.40 Million | $19.00 Million | $24.70 Million | $12.30 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 1990 | 59.3% | $11.50 Million | $19.40 Million | $23.20 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 1989 | 59.1% | $11.40 Million | $19.30 Million | $22.90 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +12.4 pp |
| 1988 | 46.6% | $8.30 Million | $17.80 Million | $20.30 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +11.3 pp |
| 1987 | 35.3% | $6.00 Million | $17.00 Million | $22.90 Million | $16.90 Million | ▼ -35.8 pp |
| 1986 | 71.1% | $18.20 Million | $25.60 Million | $28.30 Million | $10.10 Million | — |