Natural Alternatives International (NAII) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Natural Alternatives International (NAII) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.43x as of June 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($3.35 Million) in capital expenditures ($1.46 Million). Check NAII tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Natural Alternatives International Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1991–2025)
This chart tracks Natural Alternatives International's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Natural Alternatives International generate cash.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Natural Alternatives International (1991–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Natural Alternatives International from 1991 to 2025. See NAII free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.61x | $5.93 Million | $3.61 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 2023 | 1.93x | $7.02 Million | $13.52 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2022 | 2.23x | $11.87 Million | $26.49 Million | ▲ +809.4% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $20.81 Million | $5.11 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2020 | 1.23x | $3.69 Million | $4.54 Million | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2019 | 0.81x | $6.56 Million | $5.33 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2018 | 2.23x | $1.83 Million | $4.08 Million | ▲ +487.9% |
| 2017 | 0.38x | $14.14 Million | $5.35 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 2016 | 1.12x | $9.29 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2015 | 0.64x | $2.68 Million | $1.71 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2014 | 0.50x | $5.35 Million | $2.68 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $4.47 Million | $1.62 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2012 | 1.31x | $1.73 Million | $2.26 Million | ▲ +591.1% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $9.09 Million | $1.72 Million | ▼ -47.1% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $7.09 Million | $2.53 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2009 | 0.93x | $4.89 Million | $4.53 Million | ▲ +81.6% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | $2.69 Million | $1.37 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $15.06 Million | $2.73 Million | ▼ -94.1% |
| 2005 | 3.06x | $2.52 Million | $7.71 Million | ▲ +202.5% |
| 2004 | 1.01x | $3.28 Million | $3.32 Million | ▲ +241.2% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | $3.29 Million | $977.00K | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $4.80 Million | $1.08 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | $4.38 Million | $960.00K | ▼ -88.1% |
| 1999 | 1.84x | $3.10 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 1998 | 1.09x | $3.20 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +88.9% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $3.80 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 1996 | 2.36x | $1.10 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +359.6% |
| 1995 | 0.51x | $3.50 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 1993 | 0.94x | $1.80 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 1992 | 1.25x | $400.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -54.5% |
| 1991 | 2.75x | $400.00K | $1.10 Million | — |