Natural Alternatives International (NAII) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Alternatives International (NAII) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($86.25 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Natural Alternatives International to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Natural Alternatives International Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Alternatives International across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Natural Alternatives International.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Natural Alternatives International (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Alternatives International. Check earnings quality score of Natural Alternatives International to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $5.93 Million | $83.51 Million | ▲ +478.4% |
| 2024 | -0.02x | $-1.50 Million | $79.75 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $7.02 Million | $45.38 Million | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $11.87 Million | $57.48 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2021 | 0.52x | $20.81 Million | $40.20 Million | ▲ +584.7% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $3.69 Million | $48.83 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2019 | 0.38x | $6.56 Million | $17.41 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $1.83 Million | $16.96 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2017 | 1.23x | $14.14 Million | $11.46 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $9.29 Million | $20.45 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | $2.68 Million | $9.96 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $5.35 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2013 | 0.71x | $4.47 Million | $6.30 Million | ▲ +200.5% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $1.73 Million | $7.33 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2011 | 1.60x | $9.09 Million | $5.67 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2010 | 1.28x | $7.09 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $4.89 Million | $10.41 Million | ▲ +197.1% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $2.69 Million | $17.01 Million | ▼ -81.8% |
| 2007 | 0.87x | $15.06 Million | $17.36 Million | ▲ +762.9% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-3.82 Million | $29.16 Million | ▼ -189.5% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $2.52 Million | $17.22 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $3.28 Million | $18.34 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $3.29 Million | $9.95 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.61x | $4.80 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2001 | 0.46x | $4.38 Million | $9.46 Million | ▲ +504.2% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-1.65 Million | $14.39 Million | ▼ -149.9% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $3.10 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $3.20 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $3.80 Million | $9.00 Million | ▲ +145.7% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $1.10 Million | $6.40 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 1995 | 0.44x | $3.50 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +286.1% |
| 1994 | -0.24x | $-1.50 Million | $6.30 Million | ▼ -147.6% |
| 1993 | 0.50x | $1.80 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $400.00K | $2.00 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $400.00K | $2.80 Million | — |