Natural Alternatives International (NAII) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Alternatives International (NAII) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($86.25 Million) in one year. Check Natural Alternatives International (NAII) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Natural Alternatives International Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Alternatives International across 35 annual periods. Also explore NAII asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Natural Alternatives International (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Alternatives International. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Natural Alternatives International market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $5.93 Million | $83.51 Million | ▲ +478.4% |
| 2024 | -0.02x | $-1.50 Million | $79.75 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $7.02 Million | $45.38 Million | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $11.87 Million | $57.48 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2021 | 0.52x | $20.81 Million | $40.20 Million | ▲ +584.7% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $3.69 Million | $48.83 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2019 | 0.38x | $6.56 Million | $17.41 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $1.83 Million | $16.96 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2017 | 1.23x | $14.14 Million | $11.46 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $9.29 Million | $20.45 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | $2.68 Million | $9.96 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $5.35 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2013 | 0.71x | $4.47 Million | $6.30 Million | ▲ +200.5% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $1.73 Million | $7.33 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2011 | 1.60x | $9.09 Million | $5.67 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2010 | 1.28x | $7.09 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $4.89 Million | $10.41 Million | ▲ +197.1% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $2.69 Million | $17.01 Million | ▼ -81.8% |
| 2007 | 0.87x | $15.06 Million | $17.36 Million | ▲ +762.9% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-3.82 Million | $29.16 Million | ▼ -189.5% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $2.52 Million | $17.22 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $3.28 Million | $18.34 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $3.29 Million | $9.95 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.61x | $4.80 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2001 | 0.46x | $4.38 Million | $9.46 Million | ▲ +504.2% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-1.65 Million | $14.39 Million | ▼ -149.9% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $3.10 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $3.20 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $3.80 Million | $9.00 Million | ▲ +145.7% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $1.10 Million | $6.40 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 1995 | 0.44x | $3.50 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +286.1% |
| 1994 | -0.24x | $-1.50 Million | $6.30 Million | ▼ -147.6% |
| 1993 | 0.50x | $1.80 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $400.00K | $2.00 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $400.00K | $2.80 Million | — |