Natural Alternatives International (NAII) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Alternatives International (NAII) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($86.25 Million) in one year. See Natural Alternatives International free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Natural Alternatives International Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Alternatives International across 35 annual periods. Also explore Natural Alternatives International (NAII) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Natural Alternatives International (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Alternatives International. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Natural Alternatives International.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $5.93 Million | $83.51 Million | ▲ +478.4% |
| 2024 | -0.02x | $-1.50 Million | $79.75 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $7.02 Million | $45.38 Million | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $11.87 Million | $57.48 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2021 | 0.52x | $20.81 Million | $40.20 Million | ▲ +584.7% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $3.69 Million | $48.83 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2019 | 0.38x | $6.56 Million | $17.41 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $1.83 Million | $16.96 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2017 | 1.23x | $14.14 Million | $11.46 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $9.29 Million | $20.45 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | $2.68 Million | $9.96 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $5.35 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2013 | 0.71x | $4.47 Million | $6.30 Million | ▲ +200.5% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $1.73 Million | $7.33 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2011 | 1.60x | $9.09 Million | $5.67 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2010 | 1.28x | $7.09 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $4.89 Million | $10.41 Million | ▲ +197.1% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $2.69 Million | $17.01 Million | ▼ -81.8% |
| 2007 | 0.87x | $15.06 Million | $17.36 Million | ▲ +762.9% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-3.82 Million | $29.16 Million | ▼ -189.5% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $2.52 Million | $17.22 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $3.28 Million | $18.34 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $3.29 Million | $9.95 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.61x | $4.80 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2001 | 0.46x | $4.38 Million | $9.46 Million | ▲ +504.2% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-1.65 Million | $14.39 Million | ▼ -149.9% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $3.10 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $3.20 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $3.80 Million | $9.00 Million | ▲ +145.7% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $1.10 Million | $6.40 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 1995 | 0.44x | $3.50 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +286.1% |
| 1994 | -0.24x | $-1.50 Million | $6.30 Million | ▼ -147.6% |
| 1993 | 0.50x | $1.80 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $400.00K | $2.00 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $400.00K | $2.80 Million | — |