Natural Alternatives International Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Natural Alternatives International cash flow-to-debt ratio. Natural Alternatives International (NAII) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($86.25 Million) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Natural Alternatives International to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Natural Alternatives International (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Natural Alternatives International from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Natural Alternatives International across 35 annual periods. Check Natural Alternatives International (NAII) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Natural Alternatives International Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Natural Alternatives International cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Natural Alternatives International. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Natural Alternatives International cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $5.93 Million | $83.51 Million | ▲ +478.4% |
| 2024 | -0.02x | $-1.50 Million | $79.75 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $7.02 Million | $45.38 Million | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $11.87 Million | $57.48 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2021 | 0.52x | $20.81 Million | $40.20 Million | ▲ +584.7% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $3.69 Million | $48.83 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2019 | 0.38x | $6.56 Million | $17.41 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $1.83 Million | $16.96 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2017 | 1.23x | $14.14 Million | $11.46 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $9.29 Million | $20.45 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2015 | 0.27x | $2.68 Million | $9.96 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $5.35 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2013 | 0.71x | $4.47 Million | $6.30 Million | ▲ +200.5% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $1.73 Million | $7.33 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2011 | 1.60x | $9.09 Million | $5.67 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2010 | 1.28x | $7.09 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $4.89 Million | $10.41 Million | ▲ +197.1% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $2.69 Million | $17.01 Million | ▼ -81.8% |
| 2007 | 0.87x | $15.06 Million | $17.36 Million | ▲ +762.9% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-3.82 Million | $29.16 Million | ▼ -189.5% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $2.52 Million | $17.22 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $3.28 Million | $18.34 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $3.29 Million | $9.95 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.61x | $4.80 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2001 | 0.46x | $4.38 Million | $9.46 Million | ▲ +504.2% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-1.65 Million | $14.39 Million | ▼ -149.9% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $3.10 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $3.20 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $3.80 Million | $9.00 Million | ▲ +145.7% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $1.10 Million | $6.40 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 1995 | 0.44x | $3.50 Million | $7.90 Million | ▲ +286.1% |
| 1994 | -0.24x | $-1.50 Million | $6.30 Million | ▼ -147.6% |
| 1993 | 0.50x | $1.80 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $400.00K | $2.00 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $400.00K | $2.80 Million | — |