Twin Disc Incorporated Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Twin Disc Incorporated capital reinvestment ratio. Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.17x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($20.56 Million) in capital expenditures ($3.41 Million). See Twin Disc Incorporated free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Twin Disc Incorporated (1990–2026)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Twin Disc Incorporated from 1990 to 2026. This chart tracks Twin Disc Incorporated's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 34 annual periods. See Twin Disc Incorporated financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Twin Disc Incorporated Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1990–2026)
Twin Disc Incorporated capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1990 to 2026. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Twin Disc Incorporated.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.60x | $22.90 Million | $13.71 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2025 | 0.63x | $23.98 Million | $15.16 Million | ▲ +144.8% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | $33.72 Million | $8.71 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2023 | 0.35x | $22.90 Million | $7.92 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2021 | 0.68x | $6.53 Million | $4.46 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2020 | 1.17x | $9.12 Million | $10.70 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2018 | 0.97x | $6.51 Million | $6.33 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2017 | 0.99x | $3.18 Million | $3.13 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2016 | 1.24x | $3.39 Million | $4.21 Million | ▲ +134.3% |
| 2015 | 0.53x | $17.06 Million | $9.05 Million | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $25.75 Million | $7.25 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $24.48 Million | $6.58 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2012 | 0.95x | $14.44 Million | $13.73 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2011 | 0.87x | $13.86 Million | $12.03 Million | ▲ +583.9% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $35.12 Million | $4.46 Million | ▼ -82.1% |
| 2009 | 0.71x | $12.57 Million | $8.89 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2008 | 0.76x | $19.71 Million | $15.00 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2007 | 0.90x | $17.49 Million | $15.68 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2006 | 0.46x | $18.28 Million | $8.38 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2005 | 0.73x | $16.45 Million | $12.01 Million | ▲ +113.8% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $12.24 Million | $4.18 Million | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2003 | 0.66x | $6.71 Million | $4.41 Million | ▲ +316.5% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $13.07 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -66.6% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $7.38 Million | $3.49 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2000 | 0.31x | $6.88 Million | $2.13 Million | ▼ -88.0% |
| 1999 | 2.58x | $9.00 Million | $23.20 Million | ▲ +150.6% |
| 1998 | 1.03x | $7.00 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +348.6% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $20.50 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 1995 | 0.57x | $7.60 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1994 | 0.59x | $7.10 Million | $4.20 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 1993 | 0.90x | $5.20 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1992 | 0.52x | $8.40 Million | $4.40 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 1991 | 2.56x | $3.20 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +632.7% |
| 1990 | 0.35x | $20.30 Million | $7.10 Million | — |