Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.31 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($204.49 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Twin Disc Incorporated to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Twin Disc Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Twin Disc Incorporated across 36 annual periods. Also explore Twin Disc Incorporated equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Twin Disc Incorporated (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Twin Disc Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Twin Disc Incorporated.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $23.98 Million | $191.17 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $33.72 Million | $157.00 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $22.90 Million | $143.66 Million | ▲ +378.7% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-8.31 Million | $145.34 Million | ▼ -226.8% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $6.53 Million | $144.75 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $9.12 Million | $154.17 Million | ▲ +277.0% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | $-5.46 Million | $163.43 Million | ▼ -146.8% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $6.51 Million | $91.10 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $3.18 Million | $87.33 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $3.39 Million | $96.87 Million | ▼ -77.6% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $17.06 Million | $109.07 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $25.75 Million | $114.67 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $24.48 Million | $138.26 Million | ▲ +104.5% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $14.44 Million | $166.83 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $13.86 Million | $171.07 Million | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $35.12 Million | $165.82 Million | ▲ +200.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $12.57 Million | $178.58 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $19.71 Million | $174.30 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $17.49 Million | $151.10 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $18.28 Million | $146.37 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $16.45 Million | $117.81 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $12.24 Million | $115.40 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $6.71 Million | $119.60 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $13.07 Million | $98.30 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $7.38 Million | $97.97 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $6.88 Million | $95.96 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $9.00 Million | $109.40 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $7.00 Million | $79.00 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $20.50 Million | $85.00 Million | ▲ +549.0% |
| 1996 | -0.05x | $-4.70 Million | $87.50 Million | ▼ -159.2% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $7.60 Million | $83.70 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $7.10 Million | $78.50 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $5.20 Million | $76.50 Million | ▼ -65.1% |
| 1992 | 0.19x | $8.40 Million | $43.10 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 1991 | 0.06x | $3.20 Million | $52.60 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 1990 | 0.47x | $20.30 Million | $43.60 Million | — |