Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.31 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($204.49 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Twin Disc Incorporated to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Twin Disc Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Twin Disc Incorporated across 36 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Twin Disc Incorporated for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Twin Disc Incorporated (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Twin Disc Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Twin Disc Incorporated stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $23.98 Million | $191.17 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $33.72 Million | $157.00 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $22.90 Million | $143.66 Million | ▲ +378.7% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-8.31 Million | $145.34 Million | ▼ -226.8% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $6.53 Million | $144.75 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $9.12 Million | $154.17 Million | ▲ +277.0% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | $-5.46 Million | $163.43 Million | ▼ -146.8% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $6.51 Million | $91.10 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $3.18 Million | $87.33 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $3.39 Million | $96.87 Million | ▼ -77.6% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $17.06 Million | $109.07 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $25.75 Million | $114.67 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $24.48 Million | $138.26 Million | ▲ +104.5% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $14.44 Million | $166.83 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $13.86 Million | $171.07 Million | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $35.12 Million | $165.82 Million | ▲ +200.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $12.57 Million | $178.58 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $19.71 Million | $174.30 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $17.49 Million | $151.10 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $18.28 Million | $146.37 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $16.45 Million | $117.81 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $12.24 Million | $115.40 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $6.71 Million | $119.60 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $13.07 Million | $98.30 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $7.38 Million | $97.97 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $6.88 Million | $95.96 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $9.00 Million | $109.40 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $7.00 Million | $79.00 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $20.50 Million | $85.00 Million | ▲ +549.0% |
| 1996 | -0.05x | $-4.70 Million | $87.50 Million | ▼ -159.2% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $7.60 Million | $83.70 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $7.10 Million | $78.50 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $5.20 Million | $76.50 Million | ▼ -65.1% |
| 1992 | 0.19x | $8.40 Million | $43.10 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 1991 | 0.06x | $3.20 Million | $52.60 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 1990 | 0.47x | $20.30 Million | $43.60 Million | — |