Twin Disc Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Twin Disc Incorporated cash flow-to-debt ratio. Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $20.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($181.31 Million) in one year. Check TWIN capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Twin Disc Incorporated (1990–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Twin Disc Incorporated from 1990 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Twin Disc Incorporated across 37 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Twin Disc Incorporated to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Twin Disc Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2026)
Twin Disc Incorporated cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Twin Disc Incorporated. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.13x | $22.90 Million | $181.31 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2025 | 0.13x | $23.98 Million | $191.17 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $33.72 Million | $157.00 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $22.90 Million | $143.66 Million | ▲ +378.7% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-8.31 Million | $145.34 Million | ▼ -226.8% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $6.53 Million | $144.75 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $9.12 Million | $154.17 Million | ▲ +277.0% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | $-5.46 Million | $163.43 Million | ▼ -146.8% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $6.51 Million | $91.10 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $3.18 Million | $87.33 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $3.39 Million | $96.87 Million | ▼ -77.6% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $17.06 Million | $109.07 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $25.75 Million | $114.67 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $24.48 Million | $138.26 Million | ▲ +104.5% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $14.44 Million | $166.83 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $13.86 Million | $171.07 Million | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $35.12 Million | $165.82 Million | ▲ +200.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $12.57 Million | $178.58 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $19.71 Million | $174.30 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $17.49 Million | $151.10 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $18.28 Million | $146.37 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $16.45 Million | $117.81 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $12.24 Million | $115.40 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $6.71 Million | $119.60 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $13.07 Million | $98.30 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $7.38 Million | $97.97 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $6.88 Million | $95.96 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $9.00 Million | $109.40 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $7.00 Million | $79.00 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $20.50 Million | $85.00 Million | ▲ +549.0% |
| 1996 | -0.05x | $-4.70 Million | $87.50 Million | ▼ -159.2% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $7.60 Million | $83.70 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $7.10 Million | $78.50 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $5.20 Million | $76.50 Million | ▼ -65.1% |
| 1992 | 0.19x | $8.40 Million | $43.10 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 1991 | 0.06x | $3.20 Million | $52.60 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 1990 | 0.47x | $20.30 Million | $43.60 Million | — |