Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of 0.33x as of March 2026. Free cash flow of $1.75 Million represents 0% of operating cash flow ($5.31 Million). See Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Twin Disc Incorporated Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1990–2025)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Twin Disc Incorporated across 33 annual periods. Explore TWIN cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Twin Disc Incorporated (1990–2025)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Twin Disc Incorporated. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see TWIN market cap.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.37x | $8.82 Million | $23.98 Million | $15.16 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2024 | 0.74x | $25.01 Million | $33.72 Million | $8.71 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | $14.98 Million | $22.90 Million | $7.92 Million | ▲ +106.9% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $2.06 Million | $6.53 Million | $4.46 Million | ▲ +282.3% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | $-1.58 Million | $9.12 Million | $10.70 Million | ▼ -716.9% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $183.00K | $6.51 Million | $6.33 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $45.00K | $3.18 Million | $3.13 Million | ▲ +105.8% |
| 2016 | -0.24x | $-823.00K | $3.39 Million | $4.21 Million | ▼ -151.7% |
| 2015 | 0.47x | $8.01 Million | $17.06 Million | $9.05 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $18.50 Million | $25.75 Million | $7.25 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2013 | 0.73x | $17.89 Million | $24.48 Million | $6.58 Million | ▲ +1385.2% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $711.00K | $14.44 Million | $13.73 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $1.83 Million | $13.86 Million | $12.03 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2010 | 0.87x | $30.66 Million | $35.12 Million | $4.46 Million | ▲ +198.5% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $3.68 Million | $12.57 Million | $8.89 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $4.71 Million | $19.71 Million | $15.00 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $1.80 Million | $17.49 Million | $15.68 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2006 | 0.54x | $9.89 Million | $18.28 Million | $8.38 Million | ▲ +100.5% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $4.44 Million | $16.45 Million | $12.01 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2004 | 0.66x | $8.06 Million | $12.24 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $2.30 Million | $6.71 Million | $4.41 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2002 | 0.84x | $11.01 Million | $13.07 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2001 | 0.53x | $3.89 Million | $7.38 Million | $3.49 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2000 | 0.69x | $4.75 Million | $6.88 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +143.7% |
| 1999 | -1.58x | $-14.20 Million | $9.00 Million | $23.20 Million | ▼ -5422.2% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $7.00 Million | $7.20 Million | ▼ -103.7% |
| 1997 | 0.77x | $15.80 Million | $20.50 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +77.5% |
| 1995 | 0.43x | $3.30 Million | $7.60 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 1994 | 0.41x | $2.90 Million | $7.10 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +324.8% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $500.00K | $5.20 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -79.8% |
| 1992 | 0.48x | $4.00 Million | $8.40 Million | $4.40 Million | ▲ +130.5% |
| 1991 | -1.56x | $-5.00 Million | $3.20 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -340.3% |
| 1990 | 0.65x | $13.20 Million | $20.30 Million | $7.10 Million | — |