Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of 0.33x as of March 2026. Free cash flow of $1.75 Million represents 0% of operating cash flow ($5.31 Million). Explore Twin Disc Incorporated capital spending ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Twin Disc Incorporated Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1990–2025)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Twin Disc Incorporated across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Twin Disc Incorporated operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Twin Disc Incorporated (1990–2025)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Twin Disc Incorporated. Check Twin Disc Incorporated total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.37x | $8.82 Million | $23.98 Million | $15.16 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2024 | 0.74x | $25.01 Million | $33.72 Million | $8.71 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | $14.98 Million | $22.90 Million | $7.92 Million | ▲ +106.9% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $2.06 Million | $6.53 Million | $4.46 Million | ▲ +282.3% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | $-1.58 Million | $9.12 Million | $10.70 Million | ▼ -716.9% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $183.00K | $6.51 Million | $6.33 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $45.00K | $3.18 Million | $3.13 Million | ▲ +105.8% |
| 2016 | -0.24x | $-823.00K | $3.39 Million | $4.21 Million | ▼ -151.7% |
| 2015 | 0.47x | $8.01 Million | $17.06 Million | $9.05 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $18.50 Million | $25.75 Million | $7.25 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2013 | 0.73x | $17.89 Million | $24.48 Million | $6.58 Million | ▲ +1385.2% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $711.00K | $14.44 Million | $13.73 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $1.83 Million | $13.86 Million | $12.03 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2010 | 0.87x | $30.66 Million | $35.12 Million | $4.46 Million | ▲ +198.5% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $3.68 Million | $12.57 Million | $8.89 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $4.71 Million | $19.71 Million | $15.00 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $1.80 Million | $17.49 Million | $15.68 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2006 | 0.54x | $9.89 Million | $18.28 Million | $8.38 Million | ▲ +100.5% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $4.44 Million | $16.45 Million | $12.01 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2004 | 0.66x | $8.06 Million | $12.24 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $2.30 Million | $6.71 Million | $4.41 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2002 | 0.84x | $11.01 Million | $13.07 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2001 | 0.53x | $3.89 Million | $7.38 Million | $3.49 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2000 | 0.69x | $4.75 Million | $6.88 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +143.7% |
| 1999 | -1.58x | $-14.20 Million | $9.00 Million | $23.20 Million | ▼ -5422.2% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $7.00 Million | $7.20 Million | ▼ -103.7% |
| 1997 | 0.77x | $15.80 Million | $20.50 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +77.5% |
| 1995 | 0.43x | $3.30 Million | $7.60 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 1994 | 0.41x | $2.90 Million | $7.10 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +324.8% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $500.00K | $5.20 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -79.8% |
| 1992 | 0.48x | $4.00 Million | $8.40 Million | $4.40 Million | ▲ +130.5% |
| 1991 | -1.56x | $-5.00 Million | $3.20 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -340.3% |
| 1990 | 0.65x | $13.20 Million | $20.30 Million | $7.10 Million | — |