Twin Disc Incorporated Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Twin Disc Incorporated tangible net worth ratio. Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 93.6% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($14.12 Million) from net assets ($219.94 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Twin Disc Incorporated (1986–2026)
Tangible net worth ratio of Twin Disc Incorporated from 1986 to 2026. This chart shows how Twin Disc Incorporated's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 41 annual periods from 1986 to 2026. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 93.6%, reflecting net assets of $219.94 Million with intangible assets of $14.12 Million USD. Check Twin Disc Incorporated (TWIN) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Twin Disc Incorporated Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1986–2026)
Twin Disc Incorporated tangible net worth ratio by year from 1986 to 2026. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Twin Disc Incorporated from 1986 to 2026, covering 41 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Twin Disc Incorporated market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 93.6% | $219.94 Million | $14.12 Million | $401.25 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2025 | 91.9% | $164.39 Million | $13.36 Million | $355.56 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2024 | 91.8% | $155.05 Million | $12.69 Million | $312.06 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2023 | 91.3% | $145.52 Million | $12.64 Million | $289.18 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2022 | 90.1% | $131.19 Million | $13.01 Million | $276.52 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2021 | 86.6% | $130.66 Million | $17.48 Million | $275.41 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2020 | 86.4% | $139.96 Million | $18.97 Million | $294.13 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2019 | 87.5% | $182.82 Million | $22.85 Million | $346.25 Million | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2018 | 98.7% | $143.62 Million | $1.91 Million | $234.71 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2017 | 98.4% | $123.57 Million | $2.01 Million | $210.90 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 98.2% | $117.05 Million | $2.16 Million | $213.92 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2015 | 98.4% | $140.79 Million | $2.19 Million | $249.86 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2014 | 98.2% | $152.31 Million | $2.80 Million | $266.99 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 97.8% | $143.56 Million | $3.15 Million | $281.82 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2012 | 96.4% | $137.00 Million | $5.00 Million | $303.83 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2011 | 95.3% | $138.05 Million | $6.44 Million | $309.12 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2010 | 93.0% | $89.32 Million | $6.27 Million | $255.14 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2009 | 92.7% | $106.99 Million | $7.86 Million | $285.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 92.6% | $130.32 Million | $9.59 Million | $304.63 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2007 | 91.9% | $116.08 Million | $9.35 Million | $267.18 Million | ▲ +19.4 pp |
| 2006 | 72.6% | $89.81 Million | $24.64 Million | $236.17 Million | ▼ -8.4 pp |
| 2005 | 81.0% | $67.49 Million | $12.85 Million | $185.29 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2004 | 79.2% | $61.24 Million | $12.72 Million | $176.64 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2003 | 74.6% | $50.76 Million | $12.90 Million | $170.36 Million | ▼ -23.1 pp |
| 2002 | 97.7% | $58.98 Million | $1.38 Million | $157.28 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2001 | 96.6% | $58.76 Million | $1.99 Million | $156.73 Million | ▲ +15.0 pp |
| 2000 | 81.6% | $78.23 Million | $14.40 Million | $174.19 Million | ▲ +9.1 pp |
| 1999 | 72.4% | $67.50 Million | $18.60 Million | $176.90 Million | ▼ -22.6 pp |
| 1998 | 95.0% | $82.00 Million | $4.10 Million | $161.00 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 1997 | 93.5% | $73.80 Million | $4.80 Million | $158.80 Million | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 1996 | 89.2% | $75.20 Million | $8.10 Million | $162.70 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 1995 | 88.9% | $74.60 Million | $8.30 Million | $158.30 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 1994 | 85.3% | $65.40 Million | $9.60 Million | $143.90 Million | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $61.40 Million | $0.00 | $137.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1992 | 100.0% | $76.40 Million | $0.00 | $119.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1991 | 100.0% | $74.60 Million | $0.00 | $127.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1990 | 100.0% | $79.90 Million | $0.00 | $123.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1989 | 100.0% | $81.20 Million | $0.00 | $122.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1988 | 100.0% | $75.40 Million | $0.00 | $114.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $71.70 Million | $0.00 | $98.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $68.10 Million | $0.00 | $102.40 Million | — |