Urban One Inc Class D Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Urban One Inc Class D capital reinvestment ratio. Urban One Inc Class D (UONEK) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.20x as of June 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($6.21 Million) in capital expenditures ($1.22 Million). Check UONEK cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Urban One Inc Class D (1996–2024)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Urban One Inc Class D from 1996 to 2024. This chart tracks Urban One Inc Class D's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 29 annual periods. Also explore UONEK year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Urban One Inc Class D Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Urban One Inc Class D capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Urban One Inc Class D cash flow conversion.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.20x | $37.48 Million | $7.48 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2023 | 0.54x | $64.64 Million | $35.18 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2022 | 0.47x | $67.06 Million | $31.76 Million | ▲ +503.9% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $80.15 Million | $6.29 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $73.87 Million | $4.27 Million | ▼ -34.2% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $58.51 Million | $5.14 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $50.23 Million | $4.83 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $28.31 Million | $7.45 Million | ▲ +145.7% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $48.25 Million | $5.16 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $41.75 Million | $7.34 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $53.92 Million | $5.74 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $37.03 Million | $9.19 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2012 | 0.27x | $45.45 Million | $12.48 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $55.02 Million | $9.45 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $17.84 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +144.0% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $45.44 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -89.0% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $13.83 Million | $13.52 Million | ▲ +160.2% |
| 2007 | 0.38x | $44.01 Million | $16.54 Million | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $77.54 Million | $15.42 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $101.63 Million | $15.74 Million | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | $123.72 Million | $12.98 Million | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $109.72 Million | $11.38 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | $70.82 Million | $10.97 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $59.78 Million | $9.28 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $55.69 Million | $3.67 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $18.20 Million | $3.20 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $9.30 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1997 | 0.41x | $4.94 Million | $2.04 Million | ▲ +257.2% |
| 1996 | 0.12x | $2.60 Million | $300.00K | — |