Urban One Inc Class D (UONEK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Urban One Inc Class D (UONEK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 68.6% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($25.53 Million) from net assets ($81.42 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore how fast is Urban One Inc Class D growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Urban One Inc Class D Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2024)
This chart shows how Urban One Inc Class D's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 68.6%, reflecting net assets of $81.42 Million with intangible assets of $25.53 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Urban One Inc Class D (UONEK) market capitalisation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Urban One Inc Class D (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Urban One Inc Class D from 1998 to 2024, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore UONEK capex to operating cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -109.8% | $178.93 Million | $375.49 Million | $944.79 Million | ▼ -35.4 pp |
| 2023 | -74.4% | $290.58 Million | $506.85 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2022 | -73.7% | $362.67 Million | $629.99 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +15.4 pp |
| 2021 | -89.1% | $322.33 Million | $609.50 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +113.2 pp |
| 2020 | -202.3% | $199.60 Million | $603.29 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +64.9 pp |
| 2019 | -267.2% | $193.64 Million | $711.03 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -199.5 pp |
| 2012 | -67.7% | $578.05 Million | $969.51 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +58.0 pp |
| 2011 | -125.7% | $430.94 Million | $972.82 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +144.1 pp |
| 2010 | -269.8% | $194.34 Million | $718.73 Million | $999.21 Million | ▼ -74.1 pp |
| 2009 | -195.8% | $248.05 Million | $733.70 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -39.7 pp |
| 2008 | -156.1% | $315.48 Million | $807.87 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -51.3 pp |
| 2007 | -104.7% | $636.99 Million | $1.30 Billion | $1.67 Billion | ▼ -26.0 pp |
| 2006 | -78.8% | $1.02 Billion | $1.82 Billion | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2005 | -80.0% | $1.02 Billion | $1.84 Billion | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -34.7 pp |
| 2004 | -45.4% | $1.33 Billion | $1.93 Billion | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2003 | -39.4% | $1.28 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2002 | -42.8% | $1.24 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +25.9 pp |
| 2001 | -68.7% | $1.05 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2000 | -54.9% | $1.06 Billion | $1.64 Billion | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -102.9 pp |
| 1999 | 48.0% | $420.30 Million | $218.50 Million | $527.50 Million | ▲ +7453.9 pp |
| 1998 | -7405.9% | $1.70 Million | $127.60 Million | $153.80 Million | — |