Urban One Inc Class D Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Urban One Inc Class D tangible net worth ratio. Urban One Inc Class D (UONEK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 68.6% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($25.53 Million) from net assets ($81.42 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check strategic asset allocation of Urban One Inc Class D to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Urban One Inc Class D (1998–2024)
Tangible net worth ratio of Urban One Inc Class D from 1998 to 2024. This chart shows how Urban One Inc Class D's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 68.6%, reflecting net assets of $81.42 Million with intangible assets of $25.53 Million USD. See how liquid is Urban One Inc Class D's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Urban One Inc Class D Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Urban One Inc Class D tangible net worth ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Urban One Inc Class D from 1998 to 2024, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Urban One Inc Class D stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -109.8% | $178.93 Million | $375.49 Million | $944.79 Million | ▼ -35.4 pp |
| 2023 | -74.4% | $290.58 Million | $506.85 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2022 | -73.7% | $362.67 Million | $629.99 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +15.4 pp |
| 2021 | -89.1% | $322.33 Million | $609.50 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +113.2 pp |
| 2020 | -202.3% | $199.60 Million | $603.29 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +64.9 pp |
| 2019 | -267.2% | $193.64 Million | $711.03 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -199.5 pp |
| 2012 | -67.7% | $578.05 Million | $969.51 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +58.0 pp |
| 2011 | -125.7% | $430.94 Million | $972.82 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▲ +144.1 pp |
| 2010 | -269.8% | $194.34 Million | $718.73 Million | $999.21 Million | ▼ -74.1 pp |
| 2009 | -195.8% | $248.05 Million | $733.70 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -39.7 pp |
| 2008 | -156.1% | $315.48 Million | $807.87 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -51.3 pp |
| 2007 | -104.7% | $636.99 Million | $1.30 Billion | $1.67 Billion | ▼ -26.0 pp |
| 2006 | -78.8% | $1.02 Billion | $1.82 Billion | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2005 | -80.0% | $1.02 Billion | $1.84 Billion | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -34.7 pp |
| 2004 | -45.4% | $1.33 Billion | $1.93 Billion | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2003 | -39.4% | $1.28 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2002 | -42.8% | $1.24 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +25.9 pp |
| 2001 | -68.7% | $1.05 Billion | $1.78 Billion | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2000 | -54.9% | $1.06 Billion | $1.64 Billion | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -102.9 pp |
| 1999 | 48.0% | $420.30 Million | $218.50 Million | $527.50 Million | ▲ +7453.9 pp |
| 1998 | -7405.9% | $1.70 Million | $127.60 Million | $153.80 Million | — |