Urban One Inc Class D (UONEK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Urban One Inc Class D (UONEK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-161.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($642.06 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Urban One Inc Class D to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Urban One Inc Class D Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Urban One Inc Class D across 28 annual periods. Also explore Urban One Inc Class D (UONEK) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Urban One Inc Class D (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Urban One Inc Class D. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Urban One Inc Class D.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.05x | $37.48 Million | $765.86 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $64.64 Million | $920.59 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $67.06 Million | $981.97 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $80.15 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $73.87 Million | $995.89 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $58.51 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $50.23 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $28.31 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $48.25 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $41.75 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $53.92 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $37.03 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $45.45 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $55.02 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +135.2% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $17.84 Million | $804.88 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $45.44 Million | $787.49 Million | ▲ +237.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $13.83 Million | $810.00 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $44.01 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $77.54 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $101.63 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | $123.72 Million | $782.70 Million | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $109.72 Million | $739.45 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $70.82 Million | $740.34 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $59.78 Million | $870.97 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $55.69 Million | $708.15 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $18.20 Million | $107.20 Million | ▲ +177.7% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $9.30 Million | $152.10 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $4.94 Million | $101.21 Million | — |