Winmark Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Winmark Corporation capital reinvestment ratio. Winmark Corporation (WINA) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($10.73 Million) in capital expenditures ($54.90K). Check WINA cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Winmark Corporation (1994–2025)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Winmark Corporation from 1994 to 2025. This chart tracks Winmark Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. Also explore WINA shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Winmark Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Winmark Corporation capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Winmark Corporation (WINA) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $44.90 Million | $192.30K | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | $42.16 Million | $194.90K | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $43.99 Million | $383.90K | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $43.79 Million | $3.68 Million | ▲ +1334.8% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $48.35 Million | $283.10K | ▼ -93.9% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $43.22 Million | $4.16 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $50.65 Million | $9.18 Million | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | $34.94 Million | $23.80 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2017 | 1.01x | $25.16 Million | $25.48 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2016 | 1.02x | $25.66 Million | $26.28 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2015 | 1.00x | $22.30 Million | $22.33 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2014 | 1.56x | $17.98 Million | $28.00 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2013 | 0.98x | $21.65 Million | $21.12 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2012 | 1.32x | $18.17 Million | $23.98 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2011 | 1.00x | $20.59 Million | $20.55 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2010 | 1.27x | $12.40 Million | $15.70 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2009 | 1.19x | $13.67 Million | $16.25 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2008 | 2.46x | $8.98 Million | $22.09 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2007 | 5.43x | $6.25 Million | $33.96 Million | ▲ +69.4% |
| 2006 | 3.21x | $5.09 Million | $16.32 Million | ▲ +150.2% |
| 2005 | 1.28x | $5.12 Million | $6.56 Million | ▲ +2576.6% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $4.71 Million | $225.30K | ▲ +188.9% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $5.09 Million | $84.40K | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $5.39 Million | $130.10K | ▲ +262.6% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $7.44 Million | $49.50K | ▼ -90.7% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $10.15 Million | $724.90K | ▼ -96.4% |
| 1999 | 2.00x | $1.40 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +178.3% |
| 1998 | 0.72x | $3.20 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +996.1% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $6.10 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $7.50 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -97.4% |
| 1994 | 1.54x | $2.60 Million | $4.00 Million | — |