Winmark Corporation (WINA) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Winmark Corporation (WINA) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.28x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $11.88 Million exceeds net income of $9.25 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Winmark Corporation (WINA) cash conversion ratio to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Winmark Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1993–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Winmark Corporation across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Winmark Corporation (WINA) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Winmark Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Winmark Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Winmark Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.08x | $44.90 Million | $41.65 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2024 | 1.06x | $42.16 Million | $39.95 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2023 | 1.09x | $43.99 Million | $40.18 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2022 | 1.11x | $43.79 Million | $39.42 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2021 | 1.21x | $48.35 Million | $39.92 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2020 | 1.45x | $43.22 Million | $29.82 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2019 | 1.58x | $50.65 Million | $32.15 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2018 | 1.16x | $34.94 Million | $30.13 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2017 | 1.02x | $25.16 Million | $24.57 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2016 | 1.16x | $25.66 Million | $22.22 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2015 | 1.02x | $22.30 Million | $21.80 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2014 | 0.90x | $17.98 Million | $20.07 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2013 | 1.19x | $21.65 Million | $18.23 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2012 | 1.40x | $18.17 Million | $12.94 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2011 | 1.46x | $20.59 Million | $14.10 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2010 | 1.20x | $12.40 Million | $10.33 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2009 | 2.34x | $13.67 Million | $5.85 Million | ▼ -70.3% |
| 2008 | 7.88x | $8.98 Million | $1.14 Million | ▲ +283.9% |
| 2007 | 2.05x | $6.25 Million | $3.04 Million | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2006 | 1.49x | $5.09 Million | $3.42 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2005 | 2.44x | $5.12 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +111.4% |
| 2004 | 1.15x | $4.71 Million | $4.08 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2003 | 1.27x | $5.09 Million | $4.01 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2002 | 1.41x | $5.39 Million | $3.83 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2001 | 2.33x | $7.44 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +423.4% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $3.20 Million | $7.20 Million | ▼ -76.7% |
| 1997 | 1.91x | $6.10 Million | $3.20 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 1996 | 2.88x | $7.50 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +388.5% |
| 1995 | -1.00x | $-2.00 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -153.8% |
| 1994 | 1.86x | $2.60 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +139.8% |
| 1993 | -4.67x | $-1.40 Million | $300.00K | — |