Winmark Corporation (WINA) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Winmark Corporation (WINA) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of December 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($12.45 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Winmark Corporation (WINA) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Winmark Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1993–2019)
This chart shows how Winmark Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 23 annual periods from 1993 to 2019. As of December 2019, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $12.45 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Winmark Corporation market capitalisation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Winmark Corporation (1993–2019)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Winmark Corporation from 1993 to 2019, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore WINA capex to operating cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 100.0% | $12.45 Million | $0.00 | $61.84 Million | ▼ -20422.5 pp |
| 2014 | 20522.5% | $21.61 Million | $-4.41 Billion | $54.73 Million | ▲ +9388.7 pp |
| 2013 | 11133.8% | $38.14 Million | $-4.21 Billion | $53.04 Million | ▼ -8770.5 pp |
| 2012 | 19904.3% | $17.93 Million | $-3.55 Billion | $43.54 Million | ▲ +19804.3 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $35.11 Million | $0.00 | $47.75 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $23.01 Million | $0.00 | $42.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $15.33 Million | $0.00 | $56.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $13.89 Million | $0.00 | $58.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $12.67 Million | $0.00 | $56.95 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2006 | 96.1% | $15.76 Million | $608.00K | $37.61 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2005 | 97.3% | $22.29 Million | $607.50K | $26.55 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2004 | 97.0% | $21.56 Million | $654.60K | $24.77 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2003 | 96.1% | $15.41 Million | $600.60K | $19.16 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2002 | 95.5% | $11.90 Million | $538.70K | $16.18 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2001 | 92.7% | $6.62 Million | $486.20K | $12.29 Million | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2000 | 84.9% | $3.47 Million | $524.30K | $14.72 Million | ▲ +46.9 pp |
| 1999 | 37.9% | $2.90 Million | $1.80 Million | $29.60 Million | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 1998 | 52.9% | $10.20 Million | $4.80 Million | $43.10 Million | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 1997 | 61.1% | $17.50 Million | $6.80 Million | $37.80 Million | ▼ -32.6 pp |
| 1996 | 93.8% | $17.70 Million | $1.10 Million | $29.20 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 1995 | 94.8% | $21.20 Million | $1.10 Million | $34.00 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 1994 | 95.4% | $21.70 Million | $1.00 Million | $39.60 Million | ▲ +6.5 pp |
| 1993 | 88.9% | $19.80 Million | $2.20 Million | $31.80 Million | — |