Winmark Corporation (WINA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Winmark Corporation (WINA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.88 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($81.28 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Winmark Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Winmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Winmark Corporation across 33 annual periods. Also explore WINA asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Winmark Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Winmark Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Winmark Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.57x | $44.90 Million | $78.57 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2024 | 0.54x | $42.16 Million | $77.89 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $43.99 Million | $87.65 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2022 | 0.48x | $43.79 Million | $92.09 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2021 | 0.73x | $48.35 Million | $65.98 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2020 | 1.01x | $43.22 Million | $42.72 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2019 | 1.03x | $50.65 Million | $49.39 Million | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | $34.94 Million | $51.47 Million | ▲ +113.4% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $25.16 Million | $79.08 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $25.66 Million | $56.43 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $22.30 Million | $78.08 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $17.98 Million | $33.12 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2013 | 1.45x | $21.65 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +104.9% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | $18.17 Million | $25.61 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2011 | 1.63x | $20.59 Million | $12.64 Million | ▲ +151.1% |
| 2010 | 0.65x | $12.40 Million | $19.11 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $13.67 Million | $41.48 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $8.98 Million | $44.22 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $6.25 Million | $44.28 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $5.09 Million | $21.85 Million | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2005 | 1.20x | $5.12 Million | $4.26 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2004 | 1.46x | $4.71 Million | $3.21 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2003 | 1.36x | $5.09 Million | $3.75 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2002 | 1.26x | $5.39 Million | $4.28 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2001 | 1.31x | $7.44 Million | $5.67 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2000 | 0.90x | $10.15 Million | $11.25 Million | ▲ +1619.5% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $1.40 Million | $26.70 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $3.20 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 1997 | 0.30x | $6.10 Million | $20.30 Million | ▼ -53.9% |
| 1996 | 0.65x | $7.50 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +517.4% |
| 1995 | -0.16x | $-2.00 Million | $12.80 Million | ▼ -207.6% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $2.60 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +224.5% |
| 1993 | -0.12x | $-1.40 Million | $12.00 Million | — |