Winmark Corporation (WINA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Winmark Corporation (WINA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.13x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.73 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($80.81 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Winmark Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Winmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Winmark Corporation across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Winmark Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Winmark Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Winmark Corporation. Check cash flow quality index of Winmark Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.57x | $44.90 Million | $78.57 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2024 | 0.54x | $42.16 Million | $77.89 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $43.99 Million | $87.65 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2022 | 0.48x | $43.79 Million | $92.09 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2021 | 0.73x | $48.35 Million | $65.98 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2020 | 1.01x | $43.22 Million | $42.72 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2019 | 1.03x | $50.65 Million | $49.39 Million | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | $34.94 Million | $51.47 Million | ▲ +113.4% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $25.16 Million | $79.08 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $25.66 Million | $56.43 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $22.30 Million | $78.08 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $17.98 Million | $33.12 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2013 | 1.45x | $21.65 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +104.9% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | $18.17 Million | $25.61 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2011 | 1.63x | $20.59 Million | $12.64 Million | ▲ +151.1% |
| 2010 | 0.65x | $12.40 Million | $19.11 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $13.67 Million | $41.48 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $8.98 Million | $44.22 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $6.25 Million | $44.28 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $5.09 Million | $21.85 Million | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2005 | 1.20x | $5.12 Million | $4.26 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2004 | 1.46x | $4.71 Million | $3.21 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2003 | 1.36x | $5.09 Million | $3.75 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2002 | 1.26x | $5.39 Million | $4.28 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2001 | 1.31x | $7.44 Million | $5.67 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2000 | 0.90x | $10.15 Million | $11.25 Million | ▲ +1619.5% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $1.40 Million | $26.70 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $3.20 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 1997 | 0.30x | $6.10 Million | $20.30 Million | ▼ -53.9% |
| 1996 | 0.65x | $7.50 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +517.4% |
| 1995 | -0.16x | $-2.00 Million | $12.80 Million | ▼ -207.6% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $2.60 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +224.5% |
| 1993 | -0.12x | $-1.40 Million | $12.00 Million | — |