Winmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Winmark Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Winmark Corporation (WINA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.13x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.73 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($80.81 Million) in one year. Check WINA cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Winmark Corporation (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Winmark Corporation from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Winmark Corporation across 33 annual periods. Check Winmark Corporation cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Winmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Winmark Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Winmark Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Winmark Corporation (WINA) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.57x | $44.90 Million | $78.57 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2024 | 0.54x | $42.16 Million | $77.89 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $43.99 Million | $87.65 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2022 | 0.48x | $43.79 Million | $92.09 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2021 | 0.73x | $48.35 Million | $65.98 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2020 | 1.01x | $43.22 Million | $42.72 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2019 | 1.03x | $50.65 Million | $49.39 Million | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | $34.94 Million | $51.47 Million | ▲ +113.4% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $25.16 Million | $79.08 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $25.66 Million | $56.43 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $22.30 Million | $78.08 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $17.98 Million | $33.12 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2013 | 1.45x | $21.65 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +104.9% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | $18.17 Million | $25.61 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2011 | 1.63x | $20.59 Million | $12.64 Million | ▲ +151.1% |
| 2010 | 0.65x | $12.40 Million | $19.11 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $13.67 Million | $41.48 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $8.98 Million | $44.22 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $6.25 Million | $44.28 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $5.09 Million | $21.85 Million | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2005 | 1.20x | $5.12 Million | $4.26 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2004 | 1.46x | $4.71 Million | $3.21 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2003 | 1.36x | $5.09 Million | $3.75 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2002 | 1.26x | $5.39 Million | $4.28 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2001 | 1.31x | $7.44 Million | $5.67 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2000 | 0.90x | $10.15 Million | $11.25 Million | ▲ +1619.5% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $1.40 Million | $26.70 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $3.20 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 1997 | 0.30x | $6.10 Million | $20.30 Million | ▼ -53.9% |
| 1996 | 0.65x | $7.50 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +517.4% |
| 1995 | -0.16x | $-2.00 Million | $12.80 Million | ▼ -207.6% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $2.60 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +224.5% |
| 1993 | -0.12x | $-1.40 Million | $12.00 Million | — |