Winmark Corporation (WINA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Winmark Corporation (WINA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.88 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($81.28 Million) in one year. See Winmark Corporation (WINA) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Winmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Winmark Corporation across 33 annual periods. Also explore WINA shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Winmark Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Winmark Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see WINA company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.57x | $44.90 Million | $78.57 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2024 | 0.54x | $42.16 Million | $77.89 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $43.99 Million | $87.65 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2022 | 0.48x | $43.79 Million | $92.09 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2021 | 0.73x | $48.35 Million | $65.98 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2020 | 1.01x | $43.22 Million | $42.72 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2019 | 1.03x | $50.65 Million | $49.39 Million | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | $34.94 Million | $51.47 Million | ▲ +113.4% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $25.16 Million | $79.08 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $25.66 Million | $56.43 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $22.30 Million | $78.08 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $17.98 Million | $33.12 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2013 | 1.45x | $21.65 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +104.9% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | $18.17 Million | $25.61 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2011 | 1.63x | $20.59 Million | $12.64 Million | ▲ +151.1% |
| 2010 | 0.65x | $12.40 Million | $19.11 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $13.67 Million | $41.48 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $8.98 Million | $44.22 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $6.25 Million | $44.28 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $5.09 Million | $21.85 Million | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2005 | 1.20x | $5.12 Million | $4.26 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2004 | 1.46x | $4.71 Million | $3.21 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2003 | 1.36x | $5.09 Million | $3.75 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2002 | 1.26x | $5.39 Million | $4.28 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2001 | 1.31x | $7.44 Million | $5.67 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2000 | 0.90x | $10.15 Million | $11.25 Million | ▲ +1619.5% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $1.40 Million | $26.70 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $3.20 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 1997 | 0.30x | $6.10 Million | $20.30 Million | ▼ -53.9% |
| 1996 | 0.65x | $7.50 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +517.4% |
| 1995 | -0.16x | $-2.00 Million | $12.80 Million | ▼ -207.6% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $2.60 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +224.5% |
| 1993 | -0.12x | $-1.40 Million | $12.00 Million | — |