Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation capital reinvestment ratio. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 2.06x as of March 2026, meaning it reinvests 2% of its operating cash flow ($1.65 Million) in capital expenditures ($3.38 Million). See AP free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (1991–2025)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation from 1991 to 2025. This chart tracks Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 28 annual periods. See AP FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7.00x | $1.34 Million | $9.40 Million | ▲ +934.6% |
| 2024 | 0.68x | $18.03 Million | $12.19 Million | ▲ +168.7% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $33.63 Million | $8.47 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2015 | 0.46x | $20.50 Million | $9.41 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2014 | 0.67x | $19.98 Million | $13.31 Million | ▲ +113.2% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | $37.77 Million | $11.80 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | $25.44 Million | $9.67 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2011 | 0.71x | $22.29 Million | $15.78 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2010 | 0.81x | $42.95 Million | $35.00 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2009 | 0.99x | $39.67 Million | $39.24 Million | ▲ +103.2% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | $46.50 Million | $22.64 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2007 | 0.46x | $28.50 Million | $13.11 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $26.71 Million | $7.84 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $10.99 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2004 | 0.76x | $9.41 Million | $7.15 Million | ▼ -63.4% |
| 2003 | 2.08x | $4.10 Million | $8.53 Million | ▲ +686.6% |
| 2002 | 0.26x | $21.38 Million | $5.65 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2001 | 0.95x | $9.89 Million | $9.42 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2000 | 0.83x | $15.80 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 1999 | 1.80x | $20.00 Million | $35.90 Million | ▲ +254.9% |
| 1998 | 0.51x | $25.70 Million | $13.00 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 1997 | 1.06x | $14.20 Million | $15.10 Million | ▲ +112.7% |
| 1996 | 0.50x | $17.80 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +91.3% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $17.60 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 1994 | 0.51x | $7.80 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +160.7% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $12.20 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 1992 | 1.03x | $3.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 1991 | 0.85x | $8.20 Million | $7.00 Million | — |