Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation cash flow quality index. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -4.62x as of March 2025. Operating cash flow of $-5.28 Million is below net income of $1.14 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore how well can Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (1985–2024)
Cash flow quality index of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation from 1985 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation across 24 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See how leveraged is Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation's balance sheet to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1985–2024)
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation cash flow quality index by year from 1985 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7.67x | $18.03 Million | $2.35 Million | ▲ +212.2% |
| 2022 | -6.84x | $-27.21 Million | $3.98 Million | ▼ -262.0% |
| 2020 | 4.22x | $33.63 Million | $7.97 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2015 | 14.93x | $20.50 Million | $1.37 Million | ▲ +391.7% |
| 2013 | 3.04x | $37.77 Million | $12.44 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2012 | 3.05x | $25.44 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +191.2% |
| 2011 | 1.05x | $22.29 Million | $21.31 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2010 | 2.78x | $42.95 Million | $15.46 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2009 | 1.43x | $39.67 Million | $27.68 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2008 | 3.70x | $46.50 Million | $12.57 Million | ▲ +408.9% |
| 2007 | 0.73x | $28.50 Million | $39.23 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2006 | 1.61x | $26.71 Million | $16.64 Million | ▲ +119.8% |
| 2005 | 0.73x | $10.99 Million | $15.04 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2003 | 1.61x | $4.10 Million | $2.55 Million | ▼ -83.0% |
| 2002 | 9.45x | $21.38 Million | $2.26 Million | ▲ +869.1% |
| 2000 | 0.98x | $15.80 Million | $16.19 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 1999 | 1.32x | $20.00 Million | $15.10 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 1998 | 1.64x | $25.70 Million | $15.70 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 1997 | 0.86x | $14.20 Million | $16.50 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 1996 | 1.44x | $17.80 Million | $12.40 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 1995 | 1.93x | $17.60 Million | $9.10 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 1994 | 0.98x | $7.80 Million | $8.00 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 1989 | 1.00x | $9.30 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1985 | 1.00x | $3.40 Million | $3.40 Million | — |