Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 2.70x as of March 2026, meaning it reinvests 3% of its operating cash flow ($1.51 Billion) in capital expenditures ($4.09 Billion). See DUK net asset quality score to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Duke Energy Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1994–2025)
This chart tracks Duke Energy Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 32 annual periods. Check Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Duke Energy Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Duke Energy Corporation from 1994 to 2025. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see Duke Energy Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.14x | $12.35 Billion | $14.02 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2024 | 1.00x | $12.33 Billion | $12.28 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2023 | 1.28x | $9.88 Billion | $12.60 Billion | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2022 | 1.92x | $5.93 Billion | $11.37 Billion | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2021 | 1.17x | $8.29 Billion | $9.71 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2020 | 1.12x | $8.86 Billion | $9.91 Billion | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2019 | 1.35x | $8.21 Billion | $11.12 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2018 | 1.31x | $7.19 Billion | $9.39 Billion | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2017 | 1.22x | $6.62 Billion | $8.05 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2016 | 1.16x | $6.80 Billion | $7.90 Billion | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2015 | 1.01x | $6.68 Billion | $6.77 Billion | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2014 | 0.82x | $6.59 Billion | $5.38 Billion | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2013 | 0.87x | $6.38 Billion | $5.53 Billion | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2012 | 1.05x | $5.24 Billion | $5.50 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2011 | 1.19x | $3.67 Billion | $4.36 Billion | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2010 | 1.06x | $4.51 Billion | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2009 | 1.27x | $3.46 Billion | $4.39 Billion | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2008 | 1.32x | $3.33 Billion | $4.39 Billion | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2007 | 0.97x | $3.21 Billion | $3.12 Billion | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2006 | 0.91x | $3.73 Billion | $3.38 Billion | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2005 | 0.82x | $2.82 Billion | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | $4.21 Billion | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2003 | 0.74x | $3.34 Billion | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2002 | 1.09x | $4.53 Billion | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2001 | 1.36x | $4.36 Billion | $5.93 Billion | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2000 | 2.53x | $2.23 Billion | $5.63 Billion | ▲ +16.6% |
| 1999 | 2.17x | $2.73 Billion | $5.94 Billion | ▲ +138.3% |
| 1998 | 0.91x | $2.37 Billion | $2.16 Billion | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1997 | 0.62x | $2.14 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +41.8% |
| 1996 | 0.44x | $1.48 Billion | $646.50 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 1995 | 0.54x | $1.31 Billion | $713.30 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1994 | 0.75x | $1.04 Billion | $772.50 Million | — |