Duke Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Duke Energy Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.76 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($144.23 Billion) in one year. Check Duke Energy Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Duke Energy Corporation (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Duke Energy Corporation from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Duke Energy Corporation across 32 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Duke Energy Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Duke Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Duke Energy Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Duke Energy Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see DUK operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $12.35 Billion | $142.72 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $12.33 Billion | $135.09 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $9.88 Billion | $126.71 Billion | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $5.93 Billion | $126.23 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $8.29 Billion | $118.45 Billion | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $8.86 Billion | $113.20 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $8.21 Billion | $110.89 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $7.19 Billion | $101.56 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $6.62 Billion | $96.18 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $6.80 Billion | $91.72 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $6.68 Billion | $81.39 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $6.59 Billion | $79.66 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $6.38 Billion | $73.37 Billion | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $5.24 Billion | $72.82 Billion | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $3.67 Billion | $39.66 Billion | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $4.51 Billion | $36.44 Billion | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $3.46 Billion | $35.15 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $3.33 Billion | $31.93 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $3.21 Billion | $28.32 Billion | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $3.73 Billion | $41.79 Billion | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $2.82 Billion | $37.53 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $4.21 Billion | $37.71 Billion | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $3.34 Billion | $40.62 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $4.53 Billion | $42.55 Billion | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $4.36 Billion | $31.80 Billion | ▲ +171.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $2.23 Billion | $44.03 Billion | ▼ -60.2% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $2.73 Billion | $21.53 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $2.37 Billion | $17.17 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $2.14 Billion | $15.49 Billion | ▲ +32.8% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | $1.48 Billion | $14.26 Billion | ▼ -37.5% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $1.31 Billion | $7.89 Billion | ▲ +21.2% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $1.04 Billion | $7.55 Billion | — |