Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.51 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($141.57 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Duke Energy Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Duke Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Duke Energy Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore DUK total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Duke Energy Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Duke Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Duke Energy Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $12.35 Billion | $142.72 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $12.33 Billion | $135.09 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $9.88 Billion | $126.71 Billion | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $5.93 Billion | $126.23 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $8.29 Billion | $118.45 Billion | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $8.86 Billion | $113.20 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $8.21 Billion | $110.89 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $7.19 Billion | $101.56 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $6.62 Billion | $96.18 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $6.80 Billion | $91.72 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $6.68 Billion | $81.39 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $6.59 Billion | $79.66 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $6.38 Billion | $73.37 Billion | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $5.24 Billion | $72.82 Billion | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $3.67 Billion | $39.66 Billion | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $4.51 Billion | $36.44 Billion | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $3.46 Billion | $35.15 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $3.33 Billion | $31.93 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $3.21 Billion | $28.32 Billion | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $3.73 Billion | $41.79 Billion | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $2.82 Billion | $37.53 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $4.21 Billion | $37.71 Billion | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $3.34 Billion | $40.62 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $4.53 Billion | $42.55 Billion | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $4.36 Billion | $31.80 Billion | ▲ +171.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $2.23 Billion | $44.03 Billion | ▼ -60.2% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $2.73 Billion | $21.53 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $2.37 Billion | $17.17 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $2.14 Billion | $15.49 Billion | ▲ +32.8% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | $1.48 Billion | $14.26 Billion | ▼ -37.5% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $1.31 Billion | $7.89 Billion | ▲ +21.2% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $1.04 Billion | $7.55 Billion | — |