Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.51 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($141.57 Billion) in one year. See Duke Energy Corporation free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Duke Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Duke Energy Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Duke Energy Corporation equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Duke Energy Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Duke Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DUK market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $12.35 Billion | $142.72 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $12.33 Billion | $135.09 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $9.88 Billion | $126.71 Billion | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $5.93 Billion | $126.23 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $8.29 Billion | $118.45 Billion | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $8.86 Billion | $113.20 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $8.21 Billion | $110.89 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $7.19 Billion | $101.56 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $6.62 Billion | $96.18 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $6.80 Billion | $91.72 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $6.68 Billion | $81.39 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $6.59 Billion | $79.66 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $6.38 Billion | $73.37 Billion | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $5.24 Billion | $72.82 Billion | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $3.67 Billion | $39.66 Billion | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $4.51 Billion | $36.44 Billion | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $3.46 Billion | $35.15 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $3.33 Billion | $31.93 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $3.21 Billion | $28.32 Billion | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $3.73 Billion | $41.79 Billion | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $2.82 Billion | $37.53 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $4.21 Billion | $37.71 Billion | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $3.34 Billion | $40.62 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $4.53 Billion | $42.55 Billion | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $4.36 Billion | $31.80 Billion | ▲ +171.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $2.23 Billion | $44.03 Billion | ▼ -60.2% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $2.73 Billion | $21.53 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $2.37 Billion | $17.17 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $2.14 Billion | $15.49 Billion | ▲ +32.8% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | $1.48 Billion | $14.26 Billion | ▼ -37.5% |
| 1995 | 0.17x | $1.31 Billion | $7.89 Billion | ▲ +21.2% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $1.04 Billion | $7.55 Billion | — |