Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.96x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $1.51 Billion is below net income of $1.58 Billion, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) cash conversion ratio to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Duke Energy Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1994–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Duke Energy Corporation across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check DUK cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Duke Energy Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Duke Energy Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.49x | $12.35 Billion | $4.97 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2024 | 2.67x | $12.33 Billion | $4.61 Billion | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2023 | 3.44x | $9.88 Billion | $2.87 Billion | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2022 | 2.29x | $5.93 Billion | $2.59 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2021 | 2.32x | $8.29 Billion | $3.58 Billion | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2020 | 8.18x | $8.86 Billion | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +256.0% |
| 2019 | 2.30x | $8.21 Billion | $3.57 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2018 | 2.72x | $7.19 Billion | $2.64 Billion | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2017 | 2.17x | $6.62 Billion | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2016 | 3.13x | $6.80 Billion | $2.17 Billion | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2015 | 2.36x | $6.68 Billion | $2.83 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2014 | 3.50x | $6.59 Billion | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2013 | 2.38x | $6.38 Billion | $2.68 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2012 | 3.03x | $5.24 Billion | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2011 | 2.14x | $3.67 Billion | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2010 | 3.41x | $4.51 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2009 | 3.19x | $3.46 Billion | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2008 | 2.44x | $3.33 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2007 | 2.14x | $3.21 Billion | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2006 | 2.00x | $3.73 Billion | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2005 | 1.55x | $2.82 Billion | $1.82 Billion | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2004 | 2.82x | $4.21 Billion | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2002 | 4.38x | $4.53 Billion | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2001 | 2.30x | $4.36 Billion | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +83.2% |
| 2000 | 1.25x | $2.23 Billion | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -61.2% |
| 1999 | 3.23x | $2.73 Billion | $847.00 Million | ▲ +71.6% |
| 1998 | 1.88x | $2.37 Billion | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1997 | 2.20x | $2.14 Billion | $974.40 Million | ▲ +61.6% |
| 1996 | 1.36x | $1.48 Billion | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -26.0% |
| 1995 | 1.84x | $1.31 Billion | $714.50 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 1994 | 1.62x | $1.04 Billion | $638.90 Million | — |