Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.25x as of March 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($412.00 Million) in capital expenditures ($102.00 Million). See Estee Lauder Companies Inc balance sheet quality to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Estee Lauder Companies Inc Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1995–2025)
This chart tracks Estee Lauder Companies Inc's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. Check Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Estee Lauder Companies Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Estee Lauder Companies Inc from 1995 to 2025. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see Estee Lauder Companies Inc stock valuation.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.47x | $1.27 Billion | $602.00 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $2.36 Billion | $919.00 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2023 | 1.90x | $1.73 Billion | $3.29 Billion | ▲ +455.4% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | $3.04 Billion | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +95.0% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | $3.63 Billion | $637.00 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $2.28 Billion | $623.00 Million | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $2.52 Billion | $744.00 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $2.56 Billion | $629.00 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | $1.79 Billion | $504.00 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2016 | 0.29x | $1.79 Billion | $525.30 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $1.94 Billion | $473.00 Million | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $1.54 Billion | $510.20 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | $1.23 Billion | $461.00 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $1.13 Billion | $420.70 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | $1.03 Billion | $351.00 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $956.70 Million | $270.60 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $696.00 Million | $279.80 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2008 | 0.52x | $690.10 Million | $357.80 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $661.60 Million | $312.10 Million | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2006 | 0.37x | $709.80 Million | $260.60 Million | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2005 | 0.48x | $478.10 Million | $229.60 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2004 | 0.31x | $667.30 Million | $206.50 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | $548.50 Million | $163.10 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $518.00 Million | $203.20 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2001 | 0.63x | $305.40 Million | $192.20 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2000 | 0.41x | $442.50 Million | $180.90 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 1999 | 0.55x | $352.30 Million | $192.90 Million | ▼ -75.6% |
| 1998 | 2.25x | $258.20 Million | $580.50 Million | ▲ +586.4% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $253.10 Million | $82.90 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 1996 | 0.37x | $172.00 Million | $63.40 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $161.10 Million | $46.00 Million | — |