Estee Lauder Companies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Estee Lauder Companies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $412.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.67 Billion) in one year. Check Estee Lauder Companies Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Estee Lauder Companies Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Estee Lauder Companies Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Estee Lauder Companies Inc across 31 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Estee Lauder Companies Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Estee Lauder Companies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Estee Lauder Companies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Estee Lauder Companies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Estee Lauder Companies Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $1.27 Billion | $16.03 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $2.36 Billion | $16.36 Billion | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $1.73 Billion | $17.00 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $3.04 Billion | $14.48 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $3.63 Billion | $15.02 Billion | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $2.28 Billion | $13.82 Billion | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2019 | 0.29x | $2.52 Billion | $8.74 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | $2.56 Billion | $7.86 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $1.79 Billion | $7.17 Billion | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $1.79 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | $1.94 Billion | $4.58 Billion | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | $1.54 Billion | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $1.23 Billion | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $1.13 Billion | $3.85 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $1.03 Billion | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $956.70 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $696.00 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $690.10 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | $661.60 Million | $2.91 Billion | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $709.80 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $478.10 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $667.30 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $548.50 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $518.00 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▲ +62.0% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $305.40 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | $442.50 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $352.30 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +35.9% |
| 1998 | 0.18x | $258.20 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $253.10 Million | $965.40 Million | ▲ +62.7% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $172.00 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | $161.10 Million | $1.03 Billion | — |