Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $412.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.67 Billion) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Estee Lauder Companies Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Estee Lauder Companies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Estee Lauder Companies Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Estee Lauder Companies Inc assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Estee Lauder Companies Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Estee Lauder Companies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EL company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $1.27 Billion | $16.03 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $2.36 Billion | $16.36 Billion | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $1.73 Billion | $17.00 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $3.04 Billion | $14.48 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $3.63 Billion | $15.02 Billion | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $2.28 Billion | $13.82 Billion | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2019 | 0.29x | $2.52 Billion | $8.74 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | $2.56 Billion | $7.86 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $1.79 Billion | $7.17 Billion | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $1.79 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | $1.94 Billion | $4.58 Billion | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | $1.54 Billion | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $1.23 Billion | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $1.13 Billion | $3.85 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $1.03 Billion | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $956.70 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $696.00 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $690.10 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | $661.60 Million | $2.91 Billion | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $709.80 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $478.10 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $667.30 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $548.50 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $518.00 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▲ +62.0% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $305.40 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | $442.50 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $352.30 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +35.9% |
| 1998 | 0.18x | $258.20 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | $253.10 Million | $965.40 Million | ▲ +62.7% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $172.00 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 1995 | 0.16x | $161.10 Million | $1.03 Billion | — |