Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.17x as of December 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow (CA$88.56 Million) in capital expenditures (CA$15.22 Million). Check tangible net worth ratio of Trican Well Service Ltd. to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Trican Well Service Ltd. Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1996–2025)
This chart tracks Trican Well Service Ltd.'s Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TCW cash flow metrics.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Trican Well Service Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Trican Well Service Ltd. from 1996 to 2025. See free cash flow generation of Trican Well Service Ltd. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.38x | CA$167.58 Million | CA$62.89 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2024 | 0.48x | CA$154.84 Million | CA$75.07 Million | ▲ +51.9% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | CA$248.46 Million | CA$79.29 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2022 | 0.68x | CA$152.23 Million | CA$103.62 Million | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2021 | 0.73x | CA$74.10 Million | CA$53.88 Million | ▲ +302.4% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | CA$70.77 Million | CA$12.79 Million | ▼ -84.4% |
| 2019 | 1.16x | CA$28.63 Million | CA$33.23 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2018 | 0.78x | CA$100.94 Million | CA$78.79 Million | ▲ +244.0% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | CA$133.58 Million | CA$30.31 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | CA$119.83 Million | CA$23.16 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2014 | 2.05x | CA$43.94 Million | CA$90.01 Million | ▲ +226.8% |
| 2013 | 0.63x | CA$171.93 Million | CA$107.76 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2012 | 2.39x | CA$186.38 Million | CA$444.55 Million | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2011 | 1.88x | CA$308.09 Million | CA$578.46 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2010 | 1.45x | CA$192.46 Million | CA$278.80 Million | ▲ +213.7% |
| 2009 | 0.46x | CA$99.33 Million | CA$45.87 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2008 | 1.25x | CA$99.18 Million | CA$124.38 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2007 | 1.22x | CA$130.83 Million | CA$160.18 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2006 | 0.64x | CA$203.56 Million | CA$130.13 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | CA$144.70 Million | CA$119.97 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 1.12x | CA$71.20 Million | CA$79.67 Million | ▲ +140.9% |
| 2003 | 0.46x | CA$41.97 Million | CA$19.49 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2002 | 1.05x | CA$21.11 Million | CA$22.19 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2001 | 1.38x | CA$33.51 Million | CA$46.14 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2000 | 1.58x | CA$22.90 Million | CA$36.19 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 1999 | 1.83x | CA$10.00 Million | CA$18.30 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 1998 | 28.75x | CA$400.00K | CA$11.50 Million | ▲ +479.6% |
| 1997 | 4.96x | CA$5.00 Million | CA$24.80 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1996 | 4.33x | CA$300.00K | CA$1.30 Million | — |