Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.28x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$88.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$317.87 Million) in one year. Explore Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Trican Well Service Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Trican Well Service Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Also explore Trican Well Service Ltd. assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Trican Well Service Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Trican Well Service Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.53x | CA$167.58 Million | CA$317.87 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2024 | 0.80x | CA$154.84 Million | CA$194.68 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2023 | 1.28x | CA$248.46 Million | CA$193.38 Million | ▲ +40.5% |
| 2022 | 0.91x | CA$152.23 Million | CA$166.45 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 2021 | 0.84x | CA$74.10 Million | CA$88.44 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2020 | 1.00x | CA$70.77 Million | CA$70.94 Million | ▲ +546.1% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$28.63 Million | CA$185.41 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | CA$100.94 Million | CA$193.67 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | CA$133.58 Million | CA$330.17 Million | ▲ +249.8% |
| 2016 | -0.27x | CA$-93.93 Million | CA$347.72 Million | ▼ -271.3% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$119.83 Million | CA$759.88 Million | ▲ +348.8% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$43.94 Million | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$171.93 Million | CA$1.06 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | CA$186.38 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | CA$308.09 Million | CA$851.63 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | CA$192.46 Million | CA$442.06 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | CA$99.33 Million | CA$382.35 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | CA$99.18 Million | CA$512.60 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2007 | 0.37x | CA$130.83 Million | CA$355.01 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | CA$203.56 Million | CA$204.02 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | CA$144.70 Million | CA$173.56 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | CA$71.20 Million | CA$125.26 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2003 | 0.46x | CA$41.97 Million | CA$91.13 Million | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | CA$21.11 Million | CA$77.79 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | CA$33.51 Million | CA$71.46 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | CA$22.90 Million | CA$60.87 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | CA$10.00 Million | CA$21.30 Million | ▲ +1637.1% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$400.00K | CA$14.80 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 1997 | 0.34x | CA$5.00 Million | CA$14.50 Million | ▲ +95.4% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | CA$300.00K | CA$1.70 Million | — |