Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.28x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$88.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$317.87 Million) in one year. See TCW FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Trican Well Service Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Trican Well Service Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Also explore TCW net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Trican Well Service Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Trican Well Service Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.53x | CA$167.58 Million | CA$317.87 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2024 | 0.80x | CA$154.84 Million | CA$194.68 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2023 | 1.28x | CA$248.46 Million | CA$193.38 Million | ▲ +40.5% |
| 2022 | 0.91x | CA$152.23 Million | CA$166.45 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 2021 | 0.84x | CA$74.10 Million | CA$88.44 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2020 | 1.00x | CA$70.77 Million | CA$70.94 Million | ▲ +546.1% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$28.63 Million | CA$185.41 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | CA$100.94 Million | CA$193.67 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | CA$133.58 Million | CA$330.17 Million | ▲ +249.8% |
| 2016 | -0.27x | CA$-93.93 Million | CA$347.72 Million | ▼ -271.3% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$119.83 Million | CA$759.88 Million | ▲ +348.8% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$43.94 Million | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$171.93 Million | CA$1.06 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | CA$186.38 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | CA$308.09 Million | CA$851.63 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | CA$192.46 Million | CA$442.06 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | CA$99.33 Million | CA$382.35 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | CA$99.18 Million | CA$512.60 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2007 | 0.37x | CA$130.83 Million | CA$355.01 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | CA$203.56 Million | CA$204.02 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | CA$144.70 Million | CA$173.56 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | CA$71.20 Million | CA$125.26 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2003 | 0.46x | CA$41.97 Million | CA$91.13 Million | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | CA$21.11 Million | CA$77.79 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | CA$33.51 Million | CA$71.46 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | CA$22.90 Million | CA$60.87 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | CA$10.00 Million | CA$21.30 Million | ▲ +1637.1% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$400.00K | CA$14.80 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 1997 | 0.34x | CA$5.00 Million | CA$14.50 Million | ▲ +95.4% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | CA$300.00K | CA$1.70 Million | — |