Trican Well Service Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Trican Well Service Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Trican Well Service Ltd. (TCW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.28x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$88.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$317.87 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Trican Well Service Ltd. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Trican Well Service Ltd. (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Trican Well Service Ltd. from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Trican Well Service Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Trican Well Service Ltd. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Trican Well Service Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Trican Well Service Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Trican Well Service Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Trican Well Service Ltd. operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.53x | CA$167.58 Million | CA$317.87 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2024 | 0.80x | CA$154.84 Million | CA$194.68 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2023 | 1.28x | CA$248.46 Million | CA$193.38 Million | ▲ +40.5% |
| 2022 | 0.91x | CA$152.23 Million | CA$166.45 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 2021 | 0.84x | CA$74.10 Million | CA$88.44 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2020 | 1.00x | CA$70.77 Million | CA$70.94 Million | ▲ +546.1% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$28.63 Million | CA$185.41 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | CA$100.94 Million | CA$193.67 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | CA$133.58 Million | CA$330.17 Million | ▲ +249.8% |
| 2016 | -0.27x | CA$-93.93 Million | CA$347.72 Million | ▼ -271.3% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$119.83 Million | CA$759.88 Million | ▲ +348.8% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$43.94 Million | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$171.93 Million | CA$1.06 Billion | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | CA$186.38 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | CA$308.09 Million | CA$851.63 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | CA$192.46 Million | CA$442.06 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | CA$99.33 Million | CA$382.35 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | CA$99.18 Million | CA$512.60 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2007 | 0.37x | CA$130.83 Million | CA$355.01 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | CA$203.56 Million | CA$204.02 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | CA$144.70 Million | CA$173.56 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | CA$71.20 Million | CA$125.26 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2003 | 0.46x | CA$41.97 Million | CA$91.13 Million | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | CA$21.11 Million | CA$77.79 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | CA$33.51 Million | CA$71.46 Million | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | CA$22.90 Million | CA$60.87 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | CA$10.00 Million | CA$21.30 Million | ▲ +1637.1% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$400.00K | CA$14.80 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 1997 | 0.34x | CA$5.00 Million | CA$14.50 Million | ▲ +95.4% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | CA$300.00K | CA$1.70 Million | — |