Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS (OTKAR) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS (OTKAR) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -8.85x as of June 2025. Operating cash flow of TL-3.65 Billion is below net income of TL412.03 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS Cash Flow Quality Index (2000–2023)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS across 23 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS (OTKAR) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS (2000–2023)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see OTKAR stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (TRY) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.40x | TL789.83 Million | TL1.97 Billion | ▲ +127.6% |
| 2022 | -1.45x | TL-1.80 Billion | TL1.24 Billion | ▼ -259.0% |
| 2021 | 0.91x | TL952.85 Million | TL1.04 Billion | ▲ +1189.0% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | TL-51.94 Million | TL618.27 Million | ▼ -107.0% |
| 2019 | 1.21x | TL424.30 Million | TL351.59 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2018 | 1.71x | TL280.35 Million | TL164.34 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2017 | 2.05x | TL204.04 Million | TL99.42 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2016 | 5.76x | TL401.40 Million | TL69.73 Million | ▲ +722.5% |
| 2015 | -0.92x | TL-81.23 Million | TL87.84 Million | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2014 | 4.28x | TL350.39 Million | TL81.78 Million | ▲ +975.0% |
| 2013 | -0.49x | TL-53.00 Million | TL108.25 Million | ▼ -157.1% |
| 2012 | 0.86x | TL70.15 Million | TL81.82 Million | ▲ +166.2% |
| 2011 | -1.30x | TL-80.03 Million | TL61.78 Million | ▼ -117.3% |
| 2010 | 7.49x | TL150.32 Million | TL20.08 Million | ▲ +198.5% |
| 2009 | 2.51x | TL89.50 Million | TL35.67 Million | ▲ +248.0% |
| 2008 | 0.72x | TL26.36 Million | TL36.57 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2007 | 1.12x | TL51.91 Million | TL46.25 Million | ▲ +562.1% |
| 2006 | -0.24x | TL-12.46 Million | TL51.28 Million | ▼ -105.8% |
| 2005 | 4.16x | TL38.95 Million | TL9.36 Million | ▲ +1658.8% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | TL4.90 Million | TL20.69 Million | ▼ -96.1% |
| 2003 | 6.01x | TL48.83 Trillion | TL8.12 Trillion | ▲ +491.4% |
| 2001 | 1.02x | TL9.12 Trillion | TL8.97 Trillion | ▲ +168.4% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | TL2.60 Trillion | TL6.85 Trillion | — |