Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS (OTKAR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS (OTKAR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of TL-1.62 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL62.44 Billion) in one year. See OTKAR financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Otokar Otomotiv ve Savunma Sanayi AS. Check OTKAR cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | TL3.60 Billion | TL57.04 Billion | ▲ +937.5% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | TL-272.52 Million | TL36.18 Billion | ▼ -123.1% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | TL789.83 Million | TL24.18 Billion | ▲ +121.8% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | TL-1.80 Billion | TL12.05 Billion | ▼ -170.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | TL952.85 Million | TL4.49 Billion | ▲ +1458.3% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | TL-51.94 Million | TL3.33 Billion | ▼ -107.5% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | TL424.30 Million | TL2.04 Billion | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | TL280.35 Million | TL1.91 Billion | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | TL204.04 Million | TL1.73 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | TL401.40 Million | TL1.54 Billion | ▲ +536.0% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | TL-81.23 Million | TL1.36 Billion | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2014 | 0.35x | TL350.39 Million | TL991.23 Million | ▲ +835.0% |
| 2013 | -0.05x | TL-53.00 Million | TL1.10 Billion | ▼ -154.6% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | TL70.15 Million | TL795.69 Million | ▲ +170.6% |
| 2011 | -0.12x | TL-80.03 Million | TL641.30 Million | ▼ -138.4% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | TL150.32 Million | TL462.14 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | TL89.50 Million | TL427.87 Million | ▲ +185.7% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | TL26.36 Million | TL359.96 Million | ▼ -78.9% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | TL51.91 Million | TL149.70 Million | ▲ +442.5% |
| 2006 | -0.10x | TL-12.46 Million | TL123.06 Million | ▼ -127.2% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | TL38.95 Million | TL104.74 Million | ▲ +699.9% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | TL4.90 Million | TL105.35 Million | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2003 | 0.54x | TL48.83 Trillion | TL90.46 Trillion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | TL44.55 Trillion | TL94.11 Trillion | ▲ +236.7% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | TL9.12 Trillion | TL64.87 Trillion | ▲ +67.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | TL2.60 Trillion | TL30.97 Trillion | — |