Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.31x as of November 2025. Operating cash flow of $73.20 Million exceeds net income of $55.90 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Scholastic Corporation cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Scholastic Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1990–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Scholastic Corporation across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Scholastic Corporation (1990–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Scholastic Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Scholastic Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12.78x | $154.60 Million | $12.10 Million | ▲ +640.5% |
| 2023 | 1.73x | $148.90 Million | $86.30 Million | ▼ -38.2% |
| 2022 | 2.79x | $226.00 Million | $80.90 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2019 | 7.46x | $116.40 Million | $15.60 Million | ▲ +177.0% |
| 2017 | 2.69x | $141.40 Million | $52.50 Million | ▲ +250.2% |
| 2016 | -1.79x | $-78.90 Million | $44.00 Million | ▼ -116.7% |
| 2015 | 10.77x | $166.90 Million | $15.50 Million | ▲ +204.2% |
| 2014 | 3.54x | $156.80 Million | $44.30 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2013 | 5.28x | $189.10 Million | $35.80 Million | ▲ +120.7% |
| 2012 | 2.39x | $260.20 Million | $108.70 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2011 | 5.24x | $228.40 Million | $43.60 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2010 | 4.70x | $275.80 Million | $58.70 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2007 | 3.50x | $213.10 Million | $60.90 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2006 | 3.44x | $235.80 Million | $68.60 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2005 | 3.84x | $246.60 Million | $64.30 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2004 | 3.64x | $212.30 Million | $58.40 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2003 | 3.06x | $179.20 Million | $58.60 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2002 | 1.76x | $164.60 Million | $93.50 Million | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2001 | 5.47x | $198.70 Million | $36.30 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2000 | 2.84x | $146.20 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 1999 | 3.20x | $117.60 Million | $36.80 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 1998 | 4.99x | $117.70 Million | $23.60 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 1997 | 116.75x | $46.70 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +7260.3% |
| 1996 | 1.59x | $50.60 Million | $31.90 Million | ▲ +114.8% |
| 1995 | 0.74x | $28.50 Million | $38.60 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 1994 | 1.14x | $37.60 Million | $32.90 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 1993 | 1.70x | $47.90 Million | $28.10 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 1992 | 2.19x | $28.50 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 1991 | 1.82x | $25.10 Million | $13.80 Million | ▼ -82.1% |
| 1990 | 10.14x | $28.40 Million | $2.80 Million | — |